CVTA GREEN
2026 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER
10 players · average NTRP 3.31 / COLORADO
No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.
Schedule6 played
i
Flight standings47 teams · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER
| Team | W | L | Sets lost | Games lost |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1RRTC ORANGE | 7 | 0 | 3 | 71 |
| 2KNO GREEN | 7 | 0 | 7 | 126 |
| 3Colorado/Suresh/MX40&Over7.0 | 7 | 0 | 14 | 158 |
| 4RCC GREEN | 6 | 1 | 12 | 152 |
| 5CP RED | 6 | 1 | 13 | 155 |
| 6GAC GREEN | 6 | 1 | 15 | 131 |
| 7CPV GREEN | 6 | 1 | 18 | 176 |
| 8CVTA RED | 5 | 1 | 13 | 133 |
| 9LTFC GREEN | 5 | 2 | 16 | 135 |
| 10CACM ORANGE | 5 | 2 | 18 | 180 |
| 11CP PURPLE | 5 | 2 | 19 | 170 |
| 12CK-M RED | 5 | 2 | 19 | 164 |
| 13LTA-Q GREEN | 5 | 2 | 21 | 192 |
| 14BRMST PURPLE | 4 | 2 | 22 | 182 |
| 15KC-CC GREEN | 4 | 3 | 15 | 159 |
| 16BTA-C RED | 4 | 3 | 19 | 141 |
| 17GTC YELLOW | 4 | 3 | 19 | 169 |
| 18PRC GREEN | 4 | 3 | 21 | 170 |
| 19KC-CC PURPLE | 4 | 3 | 23 | 181 |
| 20PRC NAVY | 4 | 3 | 24 | 199 |
| 21WP ORANGE | 4 | 3 | 24 | 184 |
| 22PH BLUE | 4 | 3 | 25 | 197 |
| 23LEBTC TEAL | 4 | 3 | 26 | 191 |
| 24DTC BLUE | 4 | 3 | 28 | 217 |
| 25LTC-M GREEN | 3 | 3 | 16 | 146 |
| 26BP BLUE | 3 | 3 | 20 | 161 |
| 27MEA RED | 3 | 3 | 21 | 169 |
| 28NJ BLUE | 3 | 4 | 20 | 188 |
| 29RRTC YELLOW | 3 | 4 | 26 | 182 |
| 30CM YELLOW | 3 | 4 | 28 | 191 |
| 31LEBTC NAVY | 3 | 4 | 29 | 205 |
| 32LTFC PURPLE | 3 | 4 | 30 | 226 |
| 33RHCC ORANGE | 2 | 3 | 17 | 125 |
| 34BCC GREEN | 2 | 4 | 25 | 185 |
| 35NJ PINK | 2 | 4 | 25 | 179 |
| 36SS-LGT PURPLE | 2 | 5 | 24 | 180 |
| 37WP RED | 2 | 5 | 30 | 212 |
| 38CACM GREEN | 2 | 5 | 33 | 219 |
| 39KC-CC ORANGE | 2 | 5 | 33 | 225 |
| 40BRMST GREEN | 2 | 5 | 36 | 239 |
| 41CVTA GREEN | 1 | 6 | 33 | 222 |
| 42CACM NAVY | 1 | 6 | 34 | 229 |
| 43CK-M GREEN | 1 | 6 | 35 | 225 |
| 44MC BLUE | 0 | 5 | 25 | 163 |
| 45CVTA BLUE | 0 | 6 | 29 | 197 |
| 46PRC RED | 0 | 7 | 36 | 233 |
| 47SS-H PURPLE | 0 | 7 | 38 | 240 |
Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.
ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays
Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.
Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.
Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.
| Elizabeth Corujo + David Corujo | 8–7 | 53% games | +2.3% vs expected |
| Liz Olynyk + Thomas Booth | 3–15 | 39% games | −1.8% vs expected |
| Terry Tessier + Thomas Tessier | 20–36 | 45% games | −6.0% vs expected |
| Louise Fowler + Thomas Lastick | 1–5 | 44% games | −11.0% vs expected |
| Tara Peltier + Sean Kracklauer | 0–5 | 29% games | not enough data |
| Elizabeth Corujo + Thomas Lastick | 2–2 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Thomas Lastick + Tara Peltier | 2–2 | 4 matches | not enough data |
| Tara Peltier + Thomas Booth | 0–4 | 4 matches | not enough data |
Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.
Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.
Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.