Teams

CK-M GREEN

2026 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-07-05vs WP REDSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Bebber / David Frederick vs Virginia Foster / David Abdo3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSandy Reed / Ken Reed vs Susan Johnson / Michael Lim6-1, 6-3
2026-06-28vs MC REDLost 12
L#1 DoublesThomas Pott / Karen Bebber vs Pamela Catalano / Lee Davis6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesSandy Reed / Ken Reed vs Charles Sprague / Ann Rhoads4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDavid Frederick / Stephanie Courtney vs Katy Plath / David Atkinson4-6, 4-6
2026-06-21vs KC-CC PURPLELost 03
L#1 DoublesDavid Frederick / Stephanie Courtney vs Jess Shaw / Lesley Denning5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesAlisa Pott / Thomas Pott vs John McGowan / Allison Coquet3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesGary Bebber / Karen Bebber vs Robert Carlson / Ashley Barto3-6, 5-7
2026-06-14vs KC-CC REDLost 03
L#1 DoublesKen Reed / Sandy Reed vs Dave Joscelyne / Kristen Weeks6-7, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDavid Frederick / Stephanie Courtney vs Scott Adams / Crystal Adams2-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesThomas Pott / Alisa Pott vs Cail Morrison / Lindsey Morrison4-6, 2-6
2026-06-07vs SS-LGT YELLOWLost 03
L#1 DoublesGary Bebber / Karen Bebber vs Chrysie Ready / Jeff Clark0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesStephanie Courtney / David Frederick vs Carrie Bryan / Grant Saucier2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesAlisa Pott / Thomas Pott vs Christie Hughes / Mark Gianetto0-6, 2-6
2026-05-31vs LEBTC NAVYLost 12
L#1 DoublesStephanie Courtney / David Frederick vs Robin DiCicco / JP DiCicco6-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Reed / Ken Reed vs Kara Edmiston Lavaux / Andy Stephan4-6, 6-2, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAlisa Pott / Thomas Pott vs Jenna Sellers / Scott Armbruster5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2026-05-24vs PH BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesAlisa Pott / Thomas Pott vs Melodie Harris / Jeff Kesselman3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesGary Bebber / Karen Bebber vs Abigail Smith / Matthew McFall6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings47 teams · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RRTC ORANGE70201371
2KNO GREEN702017126
3Colorado/Suresh/MX40&Over7.07016514158
4RCC GREEN6118312152
5CP RED6117413155
6GAC GREEN6116515131
7CPV GREEN6114718176
8CVTA RED5113513133
9LTFC GREEN5215616135
10CACM ORANGE5215618180
11CP PURPLE5214719170
12CK-M RED5213819164
13LTA-Q GREEN5212921192
14BRMST PURPLE4210822182
15KC-CC GREEN4315615159
16BTA-C RED4312919141
17GTC YELLOW4313819169
18PRC GREEN43111021170
19KC-CC PURPLE4312923181
20PRC NAVY4312924199
21WP ORANGE43111024184
22PH BLUE4312925197
23LEBTC TEAL43101126191
24DTC BLUE4391228217
25LTC-M GREEN3311716146
26BP BLUE339920161
27MEA RED339921169
28NJ BLUE34111020188
29RRTC YELLOW3491226182
30CM YELLOW3481328191
31LEBTC NAVY3481329205
32LTFC PURPLE3471430226
33RHCC ORANGE237817125
34BCC GREEN2471125185
35NJ PINK2471125179
36SS-LGT PURPLE2591224180
37WP RED2561530212
38CACM GREEN2551633219
39KC-CC ORANGE2561533225
40BRMST GREEN2551636239
41CVTA GREEN1651633222
42CACM NAVY1651634229
43CK-M GREEN1651635225
44MC BLUE0531225163
45CVTA BLUE0651329197
46PRC RED0741736233
47SS-H PURPLE0731838240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Ken Reed
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Thomas Pott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.91
Karen Bebber
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.66
Alisa Pott
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.61
Sandy Reed
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Gary Bebber
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Stephanie Courtney
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ken Reed + Sandy Reed51041% games−3.8% vs expected
Alisa Pott + Thomas Pott1931% games−14.7% vs expected
Karen Bebber + Gary Bebber1738% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ken Reed
21W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Thomas Pott
3W–27L career · 6 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
3.37
3
Karen Bebber
44W–48L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.91
3
Alisa Pott
7W–14L career · 5 lines in 2026
12%87%1%
2.66
Sandy Reed
17W–24L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
2.61
Gary Bebber
10W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Stephanie Courtney
3W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.