Teams

KC-CC ORANGE

2026 USTA MIXED 40 & OVER - DEN · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.14 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-06-28vs LEBTC REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesZenta Pakulis / Ryan Wilson vs Christina Schwartz / David Schwartz6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesChrista Williams / Chris Martinez vs MISSY GOLDBERG / Eric Goldberg7-5, 4-6, 0-1
2026-06-14vs LEBTC TEALWon 20
W#1 DoublesRobert Mason / Erin Mason vs Michael Hursta / Cathy Welch6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChris Martinez / Leslie Hull vs Andrew Hindes / Sarah Bryan6-2, 6-2
2026-06-07vs KC-CC GREENWon 21
W#1 DoublesErin Mason / Robert Mason vs Duncan Browne / Kaitlin Vellore6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Wilson / Christa Williams vs Kim Rachwalski / Joseph Rachwalski2-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesAna Jansen / Chris Martinez vs Ron Dart / Char Eiken7-5, 6-2
2026-05-31vs SS-LGT PURPLEWon 30
W#1 DoublesChris Martinez / Zenta Pakulis vs Kent Bassett / Karissa Savage6-7, 7-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJames Jansen / Ana Jansen vs Jason Wagner / Brooke Wagner6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesRobert Mason / Erin Mason vs Lynne Paris / Steve Paris6-2, 6-2
2026-05-25vs LEBTC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesZenta Pakulis / Ryan Wilson vs Amy Quinette / Robert Quinette6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesErin Mason / Robert Mason vs Elizabeth Freestone / David Gill6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesNichole Mairs / Chris Martinez vs Christina Schwartz / David Schwartz5-7, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings47 teams · MIXED 7.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1RRTC ORANGE70201371
2KNO GREEN702017126
3Colorado/Suresh/MX40&Over7.07016514158
4RCC GREEN6118312152
5CP RED6117413155
6GAC GREEN6116515131
7CPV GREEN6114718176
8CVTA RED5113513133
9LTFC GREEN5215616135
10CACM ORANGE5215618180
11CP PURPLE5214719170
12CK-M RED5213819164
13LTA-Q GREEN5212921192
14BRMST PURPLE4210822182
15KC-CC GREEN4315615159
16BTA-C RED4312919141
17GTC YELLOW4313819169
18PRC GREEN43111021170
19KC-CC PURPLE4312923181
20PRC NAVY4312924199
21WP ORANGE43111024184
22PH BLUE4312925197
23LEBTC TEAL43101126191
24DTC BLUE4391228217
25LTC-M GREEN3311716146
26BP BLUE339920161
27MEA RED339921169
28NJ BLUE34111020188
29RRTC YELLOW3491226182
30CM YELLOW3481328191
31LEBTC NAVY3481329205
32LTFC PURPLE3471430226
33RHCC ORANGE237817125
34BCC GREEN2471125185
35NJ PINK2471125179
36SS-LGT PURPLE2591224180
37WP RED2561530212
38CACM GREEN2551633219
39KC-CC ORANGE2561533225
40BRMST GREEN2551636239
41CVTA GREEN1651633222
42CACM NAVY1651634229
43CK-M GREEN1651635225
44MC BLUE0531225163
45CVTA BLUE0651329197
46PRC RED0741736233
47SS-H PURPLE0731838240

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
Robert Mason
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.57
James Jansen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Chris Martinez
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
Daren Mairs
published 3.5
3.15
Erin Mason
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.11
Zenta Pakulis
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Nichole Mairs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.89
Leslie Hull
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Christa Williams
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.60
Ana Jansen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robert Mason + Erin Mason12361% games+13.6% vs expected
Ana Jansen + James Jansen7751% games+9.8% vs expected
Zenta Pakulis + Chris Martinez7058% gamesnot enough data
Christa Williams + Chris Martinez1445% gamesnot enough data
Nichole Mairs + Daren Mairs044 matchesnot enough data
Leslie Hull + Chris Martinez303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Robert Mason
34W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%27%73%
3.58
James Jansen
19W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Chris Martinez
33W–18L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Daren Mairs
0W–4L career · type M · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Erin Mason
51W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%15%85%
3.15
3
Zenta Pakulis
78W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%22%78%
3.11
3
Nichole Mairs
38W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Leslie Hull
44W–18L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.89
3
Christa Williams
42W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%79%21%
2.88
3
Ana Jansen
42W–57L career · 2 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.60

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.