Teams

So Cal Harris

2021 40 & OVER OPEN INVITATIONAL · 40 & OVER OPEN WOMEN

6 players · average NTRP 5.00 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-09-25vs Southern MessengaleWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesAmanda Parson Siegel / Quynh Le vs Kim Raley / Natalie Torres7-5, 6-2
2021-09-25vs PNW GibsonWon 10
W#2 Female DoublesAmanda Parson Siegel / Jennifer Lyons vs Beth Lehman-Brooks / Kristin Gibson6-3, 6-0
2021-09-24vs Mid Atlantic WalshWon 10
W#1 Female DoublesAmanda Parson Siegel / Quynh Le vs Francine McLeod / Jonni Seymour6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & OVER OPEN WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.72 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

5.02
Kathy Archibald
published
4.91
Amanda Parson Siegel
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 5
4.81
Quynh Le
published
Carmel-Mary Hill
published 5
4.57
Farrah Northcott
published 5
4.28
Karen Haas
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathy Archibald
19W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%44%56%
5.02
5
Amanda Parson Siegel
33W–9L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
4.91
Quynh Le
12W–6L career · no lines in 2021
1%92%7%
4.81
5
Carmel-Mary Hill
19W–17L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
5
Farrah Northcott
6W–8L career · no lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
4.57
Karen Haas
0W–4L career · no lines in 2021
96%4%<1%
4.28

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.