Teams

PNW Gibson

2021 40 & OVER OPEN INVITATIONAL · 40 & OVER OPEN WOMEN

6 players · average NTRP 4.90 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-09-25vs Mid Atlantic WalshLost 03
L#1 Female DoublesTanya O'Neil / Kristin Gibson vs Jonni Seymour / Francine McLeod3-6, 3-6
L#2 Female DoublesJoanna Stewart / Allison Porter vs Lisa Blasey / Leanne Mos3-6, 4-6
L#3 Female DoublesKathryn Osborne / Beth Lehman-Brooks vs Rikke Kemp / Leslie Baird2-6, 1-6
2021-09-25vs So Cal HarrisLost 03
L#1 Female DoublesTanya O'Neil / Joanna Stewart vs Quynh Le / Farrah Northcott6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 Female DoublesBeth Lehman-Brooks / Kristin Gibson vs Amanda Parson Siegel / Jennifer Lyons3-6, 0-6
L#3 Female DoublesAllison Porter / Kathryn Osborne vs Kathy Archibald / Karen Haas3-6, 1-6
2021-09-24vs Southern MessengaleLost 12
W#1 Female DoublesTanya O'Neil / Joanna Stewart vs Courtney Allen / Lee King6-1, 6-1
L#2 Female DoublesKristin Gibson / Kathryn Osborne vs Ashley Massengale / Shana Magruder5-7, 4-6
L#3 Female DoublesAllison Porter / Beth Lehman-Brooks vs Kim Raley / Natalie Torres5-7, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & OVER OPEN WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.55 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.85
Tanya O'Neil
usually #1 Female Doubles 100% · published 5
4.76
Joanna Stewart
usually #1 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 5
4.75
Beth Lehman-Brooks
usually #3 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 5
4.54
Kathryn Osborne
usually #3 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 5
4.33
Kristin Gibson
published
4.07
Allison Porter
usually #3 Female Doubles 67%, also #2 Female Doubles 33% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Joanna Stewart + Kathryn Osborne7556% games+4.7% vs expected
Joanna Stewart + Beth Lehman-Brooks7459% games+3.2% vs expected
Kathryn Osborne + Beth Lehman-Brooks91443% games−8.9% vs expected
Joanna Stewart + Allison Porter224 matchesnot enough data
Kathryn Osborne + Allison Porter033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Tanya O'Neil
121W–64L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%88%12%
4.85
5
Joanna Stewart
111W–65L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%94%3%
4.76
5
Beth Lehman-Brooks
68W–67L career · 3 lines in 2021
2%95%3%
4.75
5
Kathryn Osborne
46W–74L career · 3 lines in 2021
39%61%<1%
4.54
Kristin Gibson
30W–12L career · no lines in 2021
1%90%9%
4.33
4.5
Allison Porter
48W–72L career · 3 lines in 2021
28%71%<1%
4.07

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.