Teams

Manning 40s 3.5

2022 Piedmont USTA 40 & Over · WOMEN 3.5 40 & Over

14 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-05-10vs Miller 40s 3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesRobyn Manning / Margaret Joseph vs Melissa Dolesh / Stephanie Barnard6-2, 6-1
2022-05-03vs McPherson 40s 3.5Won 20
W#2 DoublesKimberly Gay / Patty Dutton vs Casey Emmendorfer / Betsy Hooper7-6, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMargaret Joseph / Robyn Manning vs Melissa Rainey / Jennifer Russell6-0, 6-2
2022-04-10vs McKenzie 40s 3.5Won 10
W#1 DoublesKimberly Gay / Janet Fortney vs Nancy McNeill / Nancy McCoy6-3, 6-3
2022-03-29vs WOLFF 40s 3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesKimberly Gay / Angel Smith vs Julia Barnes / Marianna Spraggs6-4, 2-6, 1-0
2022-03-22vs Miller 40s 3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesKimberly Gay / Trisha Kirby vs Melanie Miller / Kimberly Marcus6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Kimberly Gay
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.49
Jacqueline Herron
published 3.5
3.38
Kathryn Michaud
published
3.35
Tammie Hughes
published
3.31
Margaret Joseph
published
3.29
Judy Eaton
published
3.28
Krisla Berreth
published
3.27
Gladys Dunn
published 3.5
3.26
Trisha Kirby
published
3.24
Patty Dutton
published
3.21
Robyn Manning
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.97
Jill Elam
published
Janet Fortney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robyn Manning + Margaret Joseph5259% games+4.6% vs expected
Kimberly Gay + Jacqueline Herron4259% games+3.8% vs expected
Tammie Hughes + Kathryn Michaud5263% games−1.4% vs expected
Judy Eaton + Krisla Berreth3249% games−8.2% vs expected
Kimberly Gay + Krisla Berreth123 matchesnot enough data
Jacqueline Herron + Krisla Berreth123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kimberly Gay
376W–167L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%29%71%
3.57
3.5
Jacqueline Herron
36W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%54%46%
3.49
4
Chetana Honnarayanahalli
30W–30L career · type A · no lines in 2022
71%29%<1%
3.43
Kathryn Michaud
22W–12L career · no lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.38
Tammie Hughes
23W–14L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.35
Margaret Joseph
17W–8L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
Judy Eaton
39W–21L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
Krisla Berreth
24W–16L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Gladys Dunn
29W–22L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.27
Trisha Kirby
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
2%95%3%
3.26
Patty Dutton
19W–23L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.24
Robyn Manning
139W–70L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.21
Jill Elam
19W–31L career · no lines in 2022
59%41%<1%
2.97
Janet Fortney
1W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.