Teams

MEMPK LANGER

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-28vs PBTC MITCHELLSplit 22
L#1 DoublesAnnaMarie Bugosh / Faith Collins vs Emily Vidmar / Lynette di Stasio1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesMaria Langer / Emily Ragauss vs Michelle Cauthon / Jessica Kepler6-4, 6-4
W#2 SinglesAmanda Irons vs N/A6-0, 6-0
L#3 DoublesReta McKee / Shelby Klug vs Judy Mitchell / Patty Schlesinger5-7, 2-6
2026-05-21vs LTFCS WISNERLost 13
W#1 DoublesAmanda Irons / AnnaMarie Bugosh vs Shelly Schmidt / Diane Fredell6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesEmily Ragauss vs Wen Huang6-4, 0-3
L#2 DoublesJennifer Charlier Cox / Shelby Klug vs Renee Keller / Xiaohong Zhang2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesReta McKee / Jennifer Furr vs Sue Arntzen / Erin Reed6-7, 1-6
2026-05-14vs CSRC ANDERSONLost 14
L#1 DoublesMaria Langer / Amanda Irons vs Eliza Montoya / Amy Jones4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesJennifer Charlier Cox vs Aimee Anderson1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShelby Klug / Faith Collins vs Marian Nelson / Ryleigh Burns3-6, 5-7
L#2 SinglesHughes Wrighter vs Denielle Backstrom0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesReta McKee / Jennifer Furr vs Lou Ann McClendon / Judith Ertel7-6, 6-4
2026-05-07vs CCOC COLEMANLost 23
W#1 DoublesEta Santoro / AnnaMarie Bugosh vs Kolsie Coleman / Jillian Ringer4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJennifer Charlier Cox vs Kit McFarland3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesFaith Collins / Emily Ragauss vs Mary Simmons / Mary Vanryzin5-7, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesMaria Langer vs Anne Janda6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesReta McKee / Carol Presicci vs Janet Luce / Henrietta Levis2-6, 3-6
2026-04-30vs FLYHS COUTURELost 23
W#1 DoublesAnnaMarie Bugosh / Eta Santoro vs Kristi Couture / Courtney Wonnacott6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesEmily Ragauss vs Katie Schaller Amechazurra1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJennifer Charlier Cox / Carol Presicci vs Tisha Hickerson / Lea List1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesFaith Collins vs Kaleigh Doke0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesJennifer Furr / Maria Langer vs Kady Brown / Canada Coleman6-4, 6-3
2026-04-23vs PBTC MITCHELLLost 13
L#1 DoublesAmanda Irons / Eta Santoro vs Emily Vidmar / Jessica Kepler6-7, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMaria Langer vs Lisa Martin2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAnnaMarie Bugosh / Faith Collins vs Geepress Corpuz / Judy Mitchell6-4, 6-2
L#3 DoublesCarol Presicci / Shelby Klug vs Gail MacKin / DeAnn Fipps6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2026-04-16vs LTFCS WISNERWon 32
W#1 DoublesAnnaMarie Bugosh / Eta Santoro vs Sara Callender / Xiaohong Zhang6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesEmily Ragauss vs Elizabeth Wood6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesMaria Langer / Shelby Klug vs Diane Fredell / Shelly Schmidt6-2, 6-1
L#2 SinglesFaith Collins vs Erin Reed1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesHughes Wrighter / Reta McKee vs Jane Wisner / Linda Edgar5-7, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.16 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Eta Santoro
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.28
Emily Ragauss
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.27
AnnaMarie Bugosh
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.21
Maria Langer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published
3.19
Jennifer Furr
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.18
Amanda Irons
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3.5
3.17
Carol Presicci
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Shelby Klug
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.02
Faith Collins
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.89
Reta McKee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.88
Jennifer Charlier Cox
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3.5
Hughes Wrighter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Eta Santoro + AnnaMarie Bugosh6060% games+8.8% vs expected
Jennifer Furr + Reta McKee4546% games+3.8% vs expected
Eta Santoro + Amanda Irons213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eta Santoro
18W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Emily Ragauss
14W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
2%92%5%
3.28
3.5
AnnaMarie Bugosh
33W–5L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
Maria Langer
8W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
Jennifer Furr
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
8%90%1%
3.19
3.5
Amanda Irons
26W–36L career · 4 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
3.18
3.5
Carol Presicci
8W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.17
Shelby Klug
2W–5L career · 5 lines in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Faith Collins
5W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
3.02
Reta McKee
8W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
3.5
Jennifer Charlier Cox
84W–69L career · 4 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.88
Hughes Wrighter
0W–5L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.