Teams

CSRC ANDERSON

2026 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.29 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-28vs LTFCS WISNERLost 23
W#1 DoublesAnne Hiles / Marian Nelson vs Jane Wisner / Linda Edgar6-3, 6-0
L#1 SinglesDenielle Backstrom vs Wen Huang3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMARY SCOTT / Jenny McCabe vs Shelly Schmidt / Diane Fredell2-6
W#2 SinglesAimee Anderson vs Elizabeth Wood6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJudith Ertel / Robbie Conway vs Lisa Bischoff / Sara Callender1-6, 5-7
2026-05-21vs CCOC COLEMANWon 41
W#1 DoublesAnne Hiles / Eliza Montoya vs Mary Vanryzin / Joy Farmer7-6, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAimee Anderson vs Jillian Ringer6-4, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesRyleigh Burns / Marian Nelson vs Kelsey Hunt / Barbara Jean Knorr6-2, 7-5
W#2 SinglesDenielle Backstrom vs Anne Janda6-4, 6-3
L#3 DoublesMARY SCOTT / Robbie Conway vs Marishah Erickson / Shannon Leifer2-6, 1-6
2026-05-14vs MEMPK LANGERWon 41
W#1 DoublesEliza Montoya / Amy Jones vs Maria Langer / Amanda Irons6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAimee Anderson vs Jennifer Charlier Cox6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesMarian Nelson / Ryleigh Burns vs Shelby Klug / Faith Collins6-3, 7-5
W#2 SinglesDenielle Backstrom vs Hughes Wrighter6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLou Ann McClendon / Judith Ertel vs Reta McKee / Jennifer Furr6-7, 4-6
2026-05-07vs FLYHS COUTURESplit 22
W#1 DoublesEliza Montoya / Marian Nelson vs Lea List / Kristy Pring6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCaron Dumler / Ryleigh Burns vs Courtney Wonnacott / Sheri Ford0-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMARY SCOTT vs Katie Schaller Amechazurra1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesDenielle Backstrom / Robbie Conway vs Kristi Couture / Canada Coleman6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2026-04-30vs PBTC MITCHELLWon 31
L#1 DoublesMarian Nelson / Anne Hiles vs Emily Vidmar / Lynette di Stasio3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesEliza Montoya vs Lisa Martin3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMARY SCOTT / Aimee Anderson vs Gail MacKin / DeAnn Fipps6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLou Ann McClendon / Judith Ertel vs Michelle Cauthon / Patty Schlesinger4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2026-04-23vs LTFCS WISNERLost 12
W#1 DoublesEliza Montoya / Marian Nelson vs Xiaohong Zhang / Wen Huang4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAimee Anderson / MARY SCOTT vs Shelly Schmidt / Diane Fredell2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLou Ann McClendon / Anne Hiles vs Sara Callender / Sue Arntzen6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2026-04-16vs CCOC COLEMANWon 31
W#1 DoublesRyleigh Burns / Marian Nelson vs Jillian Ringer / Tracy Coons3-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCaron Dumler / Judith Ertel vs Barbara Jean Knorr / Kolsie Coleman5-7, 1-6
W#2 SinglesAimee Anderson vs Joy Farmer6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesLou Ann McClendon / Denielle Backstrom vs Mary Simmons / Kelsey Hunt7-5, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 18 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.05 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.34
Ryleigh Burns
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.21
Eliza Montoya
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Denielle Backstrom
usually #2 Singles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.13
Caron Dumler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Aimee Anderson
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.08
Lou Ann McClendon
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Anne Hiles
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.96
MARY SCOTT
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.86
Jenny McCabe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.82
Robbie Conway
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Judith Ertel
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

MARY SCOTT + Aimee Anderson6253% games−2.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ryleigh Burns
17W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Eliza Montoya
51W–53L career · 5 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.21
3
Denielle Backstrom
24W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%9%91%
3.19
3.5
Caron Dumler
52W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Aimee Anderson
20W–14L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
24%76%<1%
3.10
Lou Ann McClendon
5W–14L career · 4 lines in 2026
29%71%<1%
3.08
3
Anne Hiles
20W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
MARY SCOTT
20W–24L career · 5 lines in 2026
62%38%<1%
2.96
Jenny McCabe
1W–15L career · 1 line in 2026
84%16%<1%
2.86
Robbie Conway
1W–10L career · 3 lines in 2026
90%10%<1%
2.82
3
Judith Ertel
28W–62L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.