Teams

Elberson/40/4.5/MXD/POTC

2026 Shrev-Boss Mixed 40 & Over · 4.5 Shrev

9 players · average NTRP 4.30 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-06-20vs Cannon/40/4.5/MXD/BTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnne Jenkins / Edmund Brown vs Carla Hildebrand / Steven Floyd6-4, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMargaret Elberson / Stevie Schmidt vs Tammy Cannon / Patric Dubois6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesEmily Truong / Brian Bernard vs Rebekah Anzalone / Jared Fry6-2, 6-3
2026-05-31vs Cannon/40/4.5/MXD/BTCLost 12
W#1 DoublesMargaret Elberson / Stevie Schmidt vs Grace Rogers / Jason Doerner6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAnne Jenkins / Woodus Humphrey vs Tammy Cannon / Patric Dubois6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCarolyn Bickham / Brian Bernard vs Carla Hildebrand / Steven Floyd5-7, 6-4, 0-1
2026-05-17vs Cannon/40/4.5/MXD/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMargaret Elberson / Stevie Schmidt vs Stacy Haren / Steven Floyd6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAnne Jenkins / Edmund Brown vs Carla Hildebrand / Jared Fry4-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWoodus Humphrey / Carolyn Bickham vs Tammy Cannon / Patric Dubois4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2026-05-09vs Cannon/40/4.5/MXD/BTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesStevie Schmidt / Margaret Elberson vs Tammie Williams / John Jeffries6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesEdmund Brown / Anne Jenkins vs Steven Floyd / Rebekah Anzalone6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2026-05-03vs Cannon/40/4.5/MXD/BTCLost 12
L#1 DoublesWoodus Humphrey / Tara Hammack vs Steven Floyd / Rebekah Anzalone2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Bernard / Carolyn Bickham vs Jared Fry / Carla Hildebrand6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesStevie Schmidt / Emily Truong vs Patric Dubois / Tammy Cannon4-6, 6-0, 0-1
2026-04-19vs Cannon/40/4.5/MXD/BTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesMargaret Elberson / Stevie Schmidt vs Carla Hildebrand / Jared Fry6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTara Hammack / Woodus Humphrey vs Tammie Williams / Steven Floyd6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesCarolyn Bickham / Brian Bernard vs Stacy Haren / John Jeffries6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Shrev
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Elberson/40/4.5/MXD/POTC4212615145
2Cannon/40/4.5/MXD/BTC2461227186

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.10 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Margaret Elberson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
4.29
Tara Hammack
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.17
Brian Bernard
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.13
Carolyn Bickham
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.98
Anne Jenkins
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.92
Emily Truong
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Edmund Brown
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 4
Stevie Schmidt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published
Woodus Humphrey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Edmund Brown + Anne Jenkins4259% games+7.3% vs expected
Stevie Schmidt + Margaret Elberson5075% gamesnot enough data
Carolyn Bickham + Brian Bernard224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Elberson
19W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
4.39
Tara Hammack
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Brian Bernard
7W–7L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.17
4.5
Carolyn Bickham
12W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%83%<1%
4.13
4.5
Anne Jenkins
16W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.98
4
Emily Truong
8W–3L career · type M · 4 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Edmund Brown
22W–12L career · 7 lines in 2026
1%91%8%
3.81
Stevie Schmidt
11W–4L career · 6 lines in 2026
not enough data
Woodus Humphrey
6W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.