Teams

High Point/Herling W3.5S

2024 DALLAS TENNIS 18 & Over ADULT S · S W. Saturday League

17 players · average NTRP 3.38 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for S W. Saturday League have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.17 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Kristine Killmeyer
published
3.38
Kimberly DiNota
published
3.36
Heidi Fuller
published 3.5
3.30
Judi Robeson
published
3.29
Amy Berger
published 3.5
3.25
Jadey Liu
published 3.5
3.21
Danise McMahon
published 3.5
3.16
Dee Garza
published 3.5
3.12
Susan Ableman
published
3.01
Leslee Herling
published
3.00
Linda Dres
published
2.97
Kathy Almond
published
2.97
Karen Clemmons
published
2.92
Debbie Potaniec
published 3.5
Caitlyn Buxie
published 3
Deborah Giger
published 3
Katy Bautista
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristine Killmeyer + Danise McMahon8654% games+3.6% vs expected
Linda Dres + Kathy Almond2639% gamesnot enough data
Judi Robeson + Susan Ableman4353% gamesnot enough data
Danise McMahon + Jadey Liu3254% gamesnot enough data
Heidi Fuller + Kimberly DiNota314 matchesnot enough data
Judi Robeson + Jadey Liu404 matchesnot enough data
Jadey Liu + Leslee Herling033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kristine Killmeyer
13W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
Kimberly DiNota
32W–23L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
3.5
Heidi Fuller
22W–16L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
Judi Robeson
36W–45L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
3.30
3.5
Amy Berger
19W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Jadey Liu
16W–20L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
3.25
3.5
Danise McMahon
17W–28L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.21
3.5
Dee Garza
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%<1%
3.16
Susan Ableman
11W–20L career · no lines in 2024
17%83%<1%
3.12
Leslee Herling
12W–26L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
Linda Dres
5W–11L career · no lines in 2024
49%51%<1%
3.00
Kathy Almond
7W–23L career · no lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.97
Karen Clemmons
13W–33L career · no lines in 2024
60%40%<1%
2.97
3.5
Debbie Potaniec
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Caitlyn Buxie
3W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Deborah Giger
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Katy Bautista
15W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.