Teams

TeamForman (Riviera Prep)

2023 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Fall Day · 3.5 Adult Women

17 players · average NTRP 3.64 / REGION_8

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.39 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Judy Prado
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Tiffany Ortiz
published
3.57
Mellissa Cili
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.52
Gillian McKenzie
published 3.5
3.50
3.48
Mildred Rembisz
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.44
Lorena Guadiana
published
3.41
Leticia Diaz
published
3.36
Luisa Angel
published
3.36
Maggie Sanchez
published
3.32
Yuliet Pellegrini
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
XIMENA OTERO
published
3.10
Gina Marinelli
published 3.5
3.04
ANGELA MUSSO
published 3.5
2.96
Jane Levitz
published
Jane Forman
published
Tracie Williams
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tracie Williams + Mellissa Cili19659% games+3.5% vs expected
Tracie Williams + Yuliet Pellegrini5260% games+3.0% vs expected
Gillian McKenzie + Maggie Sanchez8756% games+0.6% vs expected
Judy Prado + Tiffany Ortiz6255% games−1.7% vs expected
Mellissa Cili + Yuliet Pellegrini7357% gamesnot enough data
Mellissa Cili + Judy Prado8258% gamesnot enough data
Yuliet Pellegrini + Judy Prado314 matchesnot enough data
Leticia Diaz + Maggie Sanchez224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Judy Prado
208W–126L career · 5 lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
Tiffany Ortiz
29W–25L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
3.5
Mellissa Cili
229W–184L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.57
3.5
Gillian McKenzie
13W–10L career · no lines in 2023
<1%45%55%
3.52
4
Elodie de Fabrique
10W–22L career · no lines in 2023
49%51%<1%
3.50
Mildred Rembisz
118W–53L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
Lorena Guadiana
1W–5L career · no lines in 2023
69%31%<1%
3.44
Leticia Diaz
78W–30L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
Luisa Angel
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%85%15%
3.36
Maggie Sanchez
17W–13L career · no lines in 2023
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Yuliet Pellegrini
206W–125L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%91%9%
3.32
XIMENA OTERO
8W–12L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Gina Marinelli
2W–10L career · no lines in 2023
23%77%<1%
3.10
3.5
ANGELA MUSSO
8W–19L career · type A · no lines in 2023
38%62%<1%
3.04
Jane Levitz
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Jane Forman
13W–8L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tracie Williams
196W–131L career · 1 line in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.