Teams

SATA/Kelly McKee

2024 SATA USTA Adult 40 & Over (Women) - Spring · Women 3.5

18 players · average NTRP 3.69 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.50 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Anne Brooks
published 4
3.71
Beth Benson
published 4
3.70
Emily Jowers
published 4
3.67
Deepa Kayyar
published 3.5
3.63
Juliet Chisolm
published
3.60
Dabny Schwarz
published 3.5
3.59
Carrie Coggins
published 3.5
3.47
Tobia Makover
published
3.47
Phyllis Curlee
published
3.41
Jennifer Conneff
published
3.36
Clara Fishel
published 3.5
3.34
Catherine Lovett
published 3.5
3.34
Martha Mathews
published
3.25
Lindsey Eberle
published
3.01
Wendy Schroeder
published
Jennifer Semones
published
Louisa Wilson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Louisa Wilson + Dabny Schwarz8363% games−6.4% vs expected
Martha Mathews + Deepa Kayyar314 matchesnot enough data
Tobia Makover + Emily Jowers224 matchesnot enough data
Juliet Chisolm + Emily Jowers314 matchesnot enough data
Emily Jowers + Deepa Kayyar404 matchesnot enough data
Juliet Chisolm + Carrie Coggins303 matchesnot enough data
Juliet Chisolm + Anne Brooks213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Anne Brooks
72W–39L career · no lines in 2024
<1%80%20%
3.89
4
Beth Benson
27W–19L career · no lines in 2024
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Emily Jowers
45W–20L career · no lines in 2024
6%93%1%
3.70
3.5
Deepa Kayyar
53W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%9%91%
3.67
Juliet Chisolm
52W–24L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%<1%
3.63
3.5
Dabny Schwarz
9W–4L career · no lines in 2024
<1%22%78%
3.60
3.5
Carrie Coggins
45W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.59
Tobia Makover
43W–23L career · no lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
3.47
Phyllis Curlee
32W–11L career · no lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.47
Jennifer Conneff
14W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%25%
3.41
3.5
Clara Fishel
37W–30L career · no lines in 2024
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Catherine Lovett
11W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%11%
3.34
Martha Mathews
18W–33L career · no lines in 2024
<1%89%10%
3.34
Lindsey Eberle
8W–13L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%2%
3.25
Wendy Schroeder
12W–39L career · no lines in 2024
47%53%<1%
3.01
Jennifer Semones
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Louisa Wilson
10W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Christy MacDonald
10W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.