Teams

Beerman - N. Giusto

2022 Polk Tri-Level · 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.44 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-08-02vs Beerman - M. DarchWon 10
W#3 DoublesTina Marcewicz / Courtney Philpot vs Sabina Elmasri / Melissa Butler6-4, 6-3
2022-07-26vs Polk/GuinnLost 02
L#2 DoublesRose Coulton / Nathaly Arredondo vs Jennifer Burns / Brittany Ward5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesCourtney Philpot / Wendy Delgado vs Meghan Savant / Leilani Guinn2-6, 1-6
2022-07-19vs Winter Haven - J. PayneWon 20
W#2 DoublesDesiree Tchipanova / Nathaly Arredondo vs Tiffany Love / Allison Beeman3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesTina Marcewicz / Courtney Philpot vs Stacey McCastlain / Rosa Jean6-3
2022-07-12vs Beerman - M. DarchLost 12
W#1 DoublesNicole Giusto / Amanda Strawbridge vs Melissa Darch / Melanie Langley6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRose Coulton / Kim Martin vs Tracey Ritter / Jennifer Rogers6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTina Marcewicz / Courtney Philpot vs Melissa Butler / Hetal Rajguru5-7, 4-6
2022-06-28vs Polk/GuinnLost 01
L#3 DoublesTina Marcewicz / Bailey Pacheco vs Amber Smith / Meghan Savant6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2022-06-21Won 10
W#1 DoublesNicole Giusto / Amanda Strawbridge vs Briquel Joiner / Catherine Mueller6-4, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.96
Cassie Miller
published 4
3.88
Meriel' Peterich
published
3.88
Amanda Strawbridge
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Kacee Swain
published
3.56
Nicole Giusto
published
3.54
Jennifer Spann
published
3.15
Allison Sorenson
published 3.5
3.12
Nathaly Arredondo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.02
Desiree Tchipanova
published 3.5
2.87
Tina Marcewicz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.86
Rose Coulton
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Courtney Philpot
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Wendy Delgado
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Courtney Philpot + Tina Marcewicz192249% games+15.1% vs expected
Allison Sorenson + Rose Coulton20459% games−0.6% vs expected
Rose Coulton + Courtney Philpot81050% games−6.7% vs expected
Rose Coulton + Tina Marcewicz1740% games−10.1% vs expected
Allison Sorenson + Tina Marcewicz6252% gamesnot enough data
Allison Sorenson + Courtney Philpot4256% gamesnot enough data
Allison Sorenson + Nathaly Arredondo314 matchesnot enough data
Allison Sorenson + Desiree Tchipanova033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Cassie Miller
15W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%61%39%
3.96
Meriel' Peterich
15W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%82%18%
3.88
4
Amanda Strawbridge
114W–40L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%82%17%
3.88
Kacee Swain
5W–0L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
Nicole Giusto
5W–10L career · no lines in 2022
32%67%<1%
3.56
Jennifer Spann
10W–10L career · no lines in 2022
37%63%<1%
3.54
3.5
Allison Sorenson
96W–39L career · no lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.15
3.5
Nathaly Arredondo
78W–70L career · 2 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.12
3.5
Desiree Tchipanova
4W–5L career · no lines in 2022
43%57%<1%
3.02
3
Tina Marcewicz
110W–80L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
2.87
3
Rose Coulton
110W–109L career · 2 lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Courtney Philpot
79W–74L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
2.75
Wendy Delgado
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.