Teams

LTFC YELLOW

2026 USTA ADULT 65 & OVER - DEN · MEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN

12 players · average NTRP 3.95 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-08-04vs SS-G ORANGEWon 21
L#1 DoublesMichael Runda / Chris Fahlbusch vs Steven Kugler / Victor Nehf3-6, 5-7
W#2 DoublesRichard Best / Scott Collins vs John Brittan / Tony Hill6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesThomas Samuelson / Paul Robbertz vs Gary Webster / Jimmie Rose6-0, 6-2
2026-07-28vs KC-RH GREENWon 30
W#1 DoublesPaul Robbertz / Joe Pascucci vs Martin Nye / David Crane6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTim Hester / Scott Collins vs Don Carter / Brad Hatfield6-0, 6-3
W#3 DoublesTom van Denover / Thomas Samuelson vs Terry Egert / Perry Christie6-2, 6-2
2026-07-21vs CR-MG BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJoe Pascucci / Tim Hester vs Kevin Hodnett / G F Tanham6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesScott Collins / Tom van Denover vs Gregory Moseley / David Winkler6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesSamuel Whittington / Thomas Forti vs Glen Erickson / Douglas Turner3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-07-14vs SS-H YELLOWWon 30
W#1 DoublesRichard Best / Joe Pascucci vs Kenneth Theobald / Kevin Lash7-6, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMichael Runda / Samuel Whittington vs Thomas Williamson / Jack Hailey6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesScott Collins / Tim Hester vs Mark Figley / Bob Gamble6-0, 6-0
2026-06-30vs DTC REDWon 30
W#1 DoublesSamuel Whittington / Michael Runda vs Bob Bolger / Frank Visciano6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesRichard Best / Paul Robbertz vs John Cleveland / Daniel Casey6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesTom van Denover / John Waring vs Stephen Ehrlich / Lloyd-Norton Cutler6-2, 7-6
2026-06-23vs SS-HP ORANGEWon 30
W#1 DoublesRichard Best / Chris Fahlbusch vs Scott Kilpatrick / Michael Martin6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTom van Denover / Thomas Samuelson vs Robert Charles / Marcelo Barboza6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesThomas Forti / John Waring vs Gary Murphy / Don Wedlaw6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · MEN 8.0 - 65 & OVER - DEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LTFC YELLOW60162594
2MC GOLD601449104
3CR-MG BLUE1571124181
4ARCA NAVY1551326175
5SS-HP ORANGE1531531191

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.05
Paul Robbertz
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.96
Thomas Samuelson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.94
Richard Best
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.92
Chris Fahlbusch
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.92
Tim Hester
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.78
Samuel Whittington
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.75
Tom van Denover
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.74
John Waring
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Michael Runda
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Joe Pascucci
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.56
Thomas Forti
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
Scott Collins
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michael Runda + Samuel Whittington11260% games+11.6% vs expected
Thomas Samuelson + Tom van Denover8265% games+3.4% vs expected
Samuel Whittington + Tom van Denover4453% gamesnot enough data
Tom van Denover + Joe Pascucci6167% gamesnot enough data
Michael Runda + Tom van Denover2345% gamesnot enough data
Michael Runda + Thomas Forti2349% gamesnot enough data
Samuel Whittington + Thomas Forti224 matchesnot enough data
Scott Collins + Tom van Denover303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Paul Robbertz
32W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%35%65%
4.05
4
Thomas Samuelson
149W–92L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%61%39%
3.96
Richard Best
32W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.94
4
Chris Fahlbusch
35W–35L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%72%28%
3.92
4
Tim Hester
27W–15L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
<1%72%27%
3.92
4
Samuel Whittington
51W–25L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.78
4
Tom van Denover
74W–40L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
3.75
4
John Waring
18W–17L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Michael Runda
65W–53L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
4
Joe Pascucci
47W–46L career · 3 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.63
3.5
Thomas Forti
82W–106L career · type A · 6 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.56
Scott Collins
14W–1L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.