Teams

Ensell/Memphis

2024 Mixed 40 & Over - Memphis · 3.0 Mixed 40 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-07-16vs Schneiderman/MemphisWon 21
W#1 DoublesMatthew Beickert / Christine Mendoza vs William Winstead / Tina Schneiderman6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesXiaoqun Akers / Malcolm Pratt vs Susan Patrone / Robert O'Bryan6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJohnny Kolwyck / Monica Gallimore vs Jo Picha / Christopher Heimann4-6, 1-6
2024-07-15vs Schneiderman/MemphisLost 12
W#1 DoublesMatthew Beickert / Xiaoqun Akers vs Susan Patrone / Christopher Heimann6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesAmasa Lacy / Malcolm Pratt vs Tina Schneiderman / William Winstead1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesStuart Breakstone / Lisa Monahan vs Jo Picha / Edgar Contreras3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-06-15vs Schneiderman/MemphisSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMatthew Beickert / Lisa Monahan vs Tina Schneiderman / William Winstead6-3, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAmasa Lacy / James French vs Robert O'Bryan / Susan Patrone6-4, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Mixed 40 & Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.77 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
James Ensell
published 3
2.92
Christine Mendoza
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.92
Amasa Lacy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.81
Matthew Beickert
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Deepa Nair
published 3
2.79
Lisa Monahan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.72
Malcolm Pratt
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Xiaoqun Akers
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.61
Stuart Breakstone
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
Monica Gallimore
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.56
James French
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Johnny Kolwyck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
James Ensell
44W–12L career · no lines in 2024
<1%27%73%
3.08
3
Christine Mendoza
35W–30L career · 1 line in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
3
Amasa Lacy
56W–51L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%74%26%
2.92
Matthew Beickert
16W–25L career · 3 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Deepa Nair
40W–32L career · no lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.80
Lisa Monahan
27W–43L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%93%5%
2.79
Malcolm Pratt
6W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
98%2%<1%
2.72
Xiaoqun Akers
36W–62L career · 2 lines in 2024
6%93%1%
2.70
Stuart Breakstone
10W–32L career · 1 line in 2024
20%80%<1%
2.61
Monica Gallimore
14W–26L career · 1 line in 2024
31%69%<1%
2.56
3
James French
4W–20L career · 1 line in 2024
33%67%<1%
2.56
Johnny Kolwyck
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.