Teams

GIT/Janie Doroff

2025 GIT USTA Adult 55 & Over - Winter '25 · Women 3.0 Monday 10am

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-19vs JITC/Sharon StoverSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnke Hildreth / Rene Boven vs Kathy Schoendorf / Karen Hufnagel4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesKaarin MacKinnon / Jeanne Swindle vs Wendy McClellan / Leslie Irwin6-1, 6-0
2025-03-17vs JITC/Sharon StoverSplit 11
L#1 DoublesAnke Hildreth / Sandra Eastwick vs Kathy Schoendorf / Wendy McClellan3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJanie Doroff / Jeanne Swindle vs Jennifer Andrews / Leslie Irwin6-2, 6-1
2025-02-24vs JITC/Sharon StoverLost 12
L#1 DoublesSandra Eastwick / Pam Miller vs Kathy Defina / Karen Hufnagel6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesJane Khoury / Kaarin MacKinnon vs Wendy McClellan / Jennifer Andrews6-1, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJennifer Beato / Linda Lavastida-kapp vs Robbie Clark / Sharon Stover5-7, 3-6
2025-02-10vs JITC/Sharon StoverWon 30
W#1 DoublesRene Boven / Janie Doroff vs Robbie Clark / Kathy Defina6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSara Fennell / Debra Miller vs Wendy McClellan / Darla Wright6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesAnke Hildreth / Jane Khoury vs Jennifer Andrews / Leslie Irwin6-1, 6-2
2025-02-03vs JITC/Sharon StoverWon 21
W#1 DoublesDebra Miller / Janie Doroff vs Kathy Schoendorf / Kathy Defina6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesRene Boven / Sara Fennell vs Leslie Irwin / Sharon Stover6-2, 6-2
L#3 DoublesLinda Lavastida-kapp / Kitty Hazelkorn vs Darla Wright / Wendy McClellan3-6, 1-6
2025-01-27vs JITC/Sharon StoverWon 21
L#1 DoublesAnke Hildreth / Jane Khoury vs Karen Hufnagel / Kathy Defina4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJennifer Beato / Pam Miller vs Kathy Schoendorf / Jennifer Andrews6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesRene Boven / Debra Miller vs Robbie Clark / Sharon Stover6-2, 6-3
2025-01-20vs JITC/Sharon StoverWon 21
L#1 DoublesPam Miller / Kitty Hazelkorn vs Karen Hufnagel / Kathy Schoendorf5-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesJanie Doroff / Jennifer Beato vs Jennifer Andrews / Sharon Stover6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesSara Fennell / Jane Khoury vs Wendy McClellan / Leslie Irwin6-3, 6-2
2025-01-14vs JITC/Sharon StoverWon 30
W#1 DoublesSara Fennell / Debra Miller vs Kathy Schoendorf / Karen Hufnagel4-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJanie Doroff / Pam Miller vs Kathy Defina / Darla Wright6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJane Khoury / Kitty Hazelkorn vs Jennifer Andrews / Wendy McClellan6-3, 6-1
2025-01-06vs JITC/Sharon StoverWon 21
W#1 DoublesJanie Doroff / Anke Hildreth vs Robbie Clark / Kathy Schoendorf6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSara Fennell / Jennifer Beato vs Darla Wright / Kathy Defina7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesKitty Hazelkorn / Pam Miller vs Sharon Stover / Leslie Irwin3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 Monday 10am have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.80
Janie Doroff
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.64
Jane Khoury
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.62
Jeanne Swindle
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Kaarin MacKinnon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Sandra Eastwick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Pam Miller
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.33
Rene Boven
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.27
Anke Hildreth
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.26
Sara Fennell
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
2.22
Linda Lavastida-kapp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.12
Kitty Hazelkorn
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Jennifer Beato
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Janie Doroff + Kaarin MacKinnon213 matchesnot enough data
Pam Miller + Kitty Hazelkorn123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Janie Doroff
16W–4L career · 9 lines in 2025
0%2%98%
2.80
Jane Khoury
5W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
15%84%1%
2.64
Jeanne Swindle
4W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
2.62
Kaarin MacKinnon
8W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%42%58%
2.53
Sandra Eastwick
1W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
42%58%<1%
2.53
Pam Miller
21W–44L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%81%19%
2.38
Rene Boven
5W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.33
3
Anke Hildreth
6W–7L career · 5 lines in 2025
95%5%<1%
2.27
Sara Fennell
7W–12L career · 7 lines in 2025
0%96%4%
2.26
Linda Lavastida-kapp
3W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.22
Kitty Hazelkorn
4W–11L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.12
Jennifer Beato
3W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.