Teams

JITC/Sharon Stover

2025 GIT USTA Adult 55 & Over - Winter '25 · Women 3.0 Monday 10am

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-03-19vs GIT/Janie DoroffSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKathy Schoendorf / Karen Hufnagel vs Anke Hildreth / Rene Boven6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWendy McClellan / Leslie Irwin vs Kaarin MacKinnon / Jeanne Swindle1-6, 0-6
2025-03-17vs GIT/Janie DoroffSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKathy Schoendorf / Wendy McClellan vs Anke Hildreth / Sandra Eastwick6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennifer Andrews / Leslie Irwin vs Janie Doroff / Jeanne Swindle2-6, 1-6
2025-02-24vs GIT/Janie DoroffWon 21
W#1 DoublesKathy Defina / Karen Hufnagel vs Sandra Eastwick / Pam Miller7-6, 6-3
L#2 DoublesWendy McClellan / Jennifer Andrews vs Jane Khoury / Kaarin MacKinnon1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesRobbie Clark / Sharon Stover vs Jennifer Beato / Linda Lavastida-kapp7-5, 6-3
2025-02-10vs GIT/Janie DoroffLost 03
L#1 DoublesRobbie Clark / Kathy Defina vs Rene Boven / Janie Doroff2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesWendy McClellan / Darla Wright vs Sara Fennell / Debra Miller0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Andrews / Leslie Irwin vs Anke Hildreth / Jane Khoury1-6, 2-6
2025-02-03vs GIT/Janie DoroffLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathy Schoendorf / Kathy Defina vs Debra Miller / Janie Doroff3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesLeslie Irwin / Sharon Stover vs Rene Boven / Sara Fennell2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesDarla Wright / Wendy McClellan vs Linda Lavastida-kapp / Kitty Hazelkorn6-3, 6-1
2025-01-27vs GIT/Janie DoroffLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Hufnagel / Kathy Defina vs Anke Hildreth / Jane Khoury6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKathy Schoendorf / Jennifer Andrews vs Jennifer Beato / Pam Miller1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRobbie Clark / Sharon Stover vs Rene Boven / Debra Miller2-6, 3-6
2025-01-20vs GIT/Janie DoroffLost 12
W#1 DoublesKaren Hufnagel / Kathy Schoendorf vs Pam Miller / Kitty Hazelkorn7-5, 6-4
L#2 DoublesJennifer Andrews / Sharon Stover vs Janie Doroff / Jennifer Beato2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesWendy McClellan / Leslie Irwin vs Sara Fennell / Jane Khoury3-6, 2-6
2025-01-14vs GIT/Janie DoroffLost 03
L#1 DoublesKathy Schoendorf / Karen Hufnagel vs Sara Fennell / Debra Miller6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesKathy Defina / Darla Wright vs Janie Doroff / Pam Miller3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesJennifer Andrews / Wendy McClellan vs Jane Khoury / Kitty Hazelkorn3-6, 1-6
2025-01-06vs GIT/Janie DoroffLost 12
L#1 DoublesRobbie Clark / Kathy Schoendorf vs Janie Doroff / Anke Hildreth2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesDarla Wright / Kathy Defina vs Sara Fennell / Jennifer Beato6-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesSharon Stover / Leslie Irwin vs Kitty Hazelkorn / Pam Miller6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 3.0 Monday 10am
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1GIT/Janie Doroff8119818179
2JITC/Sharon Stover1881938281

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Darla Wright
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Kathy Defina
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
Kathy Schoendorf
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.68
Robbie Clark
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
Sharon Stover
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.58
Wendy McClellan
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.51
Karen Hufnagel
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.44
Leslie Irwin
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Irwin + Sharon Stover123 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Schoendorf + Wendy McClellan303 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Schoendorf + Karen Hufnagel213 matchesnot enough data
Darla Wright + Wendy McClellan123 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Defina + Karen Hufnagel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Darla Wright
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kathy Defina
4W–6L career · 6 lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
Kathy Schoendorf
7W–6L career · 7 lines in 2025
3%95%2%
2.74
Robbie Clark
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%1%
2.68
Sharon Stover
8W–12L career · 5 lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.59
Wendy McClellan
9W–22L career · 10 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
Karen Hufnagel
4W–11L career · 9 lines in 2025
48%52%<1%
2.51
Leslie Irwin
2W–11L career · 6 lines in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.44

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.