Teams

Murphy, Susan

2025 Adult Mid Tri-Level 3.5, 4.0, 4.5 · Women 3.5,4.0,4.5 Tri Level

16 players · average NTRP 3.75 / HEART OF AMERICA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-24vs Clark, JaneWon 30
W#1 DoublesJennifer VanMeter / Sarah Taber vs Renetta Ramsdell / Amie Schick6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Hudson / Christy Mayo vs Susie Keefer / Ruth Knox6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesChristie Ross / KALEE WOOD vs Abbie Dougherty / Jennifer Haake7-5, 6-1
L#1 DoublesJackie Stahl / Sarah Taber vs Lauren Blazar / Mallory Plungkhen2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Mayer / Vanessa Watkins vs Chriss Shoup-Duntz / Ashton Sparks2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNancy MacK / Christie Ross vs Betsy Norberg / Erin Atherton1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-09-10vs Groves, MaryWon 21
W#1 DoublesJennifer VanMeter / Dina Mitchell vs Allyson Braun / Kari Heybrock7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJennifer Hudson / Jessie Pullins vs Ruth Ospino / Kristin Heurtin7-6, 4-2
L#3 DoublesTricia Boushka / Sonia Crim vs Mary Brauer / Caroline VanDeusen6-0, 2-6, 0-1
2025-09-03vs Chiao, DeniseLost 12
L#1 DoublesDina Mitchell / Erin Hambrick vs Kayla Ruelle / Lara Anderson3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesChristy Mayo / Vanessa Watkins vs Vanessa Connell / Keri Evans0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesKALEE WOOD / Christie Ross vs Lori Blinn / Hayley Hanson6-3, 6-2
2025-08-27vs Doerr, SusanLost 03
L#1 DoublesJackie Stahl / Jennifer VanMeter vs Carolyn Ellspermann / Jill Burgdorfer6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesSusan Mayer / Christy Mayo vs Laura Chisholm / Bridget Throm2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesNancy MacK / KALEE WOOD vs Jenifer Muir / Trisha Jolliffe1-6, 3-6
2025-08-20vs Vaughn, OlaLost 12
W#1 DoublesSarah Taber / Erin Hambrick vs Alli Gershon / Mindy Stewart6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennifer Hudson / Vanessa Watkins vs Ashley Ascencio / Sarah Acosta3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTricia Boushka / Sonia Crim vs Brooke Chiaverini / Monique Marquette0-6, 4-6
2025-08-13vs Fendler, KathleenLost 03
L#1 DoublesJackie Stahl / Dina Mitchell vs Cynthia Kuhlman / Trina Kahl6-7, 5-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJessie Pullins / Susan Mayer vs Micah Schloegel / Sarah Ross1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSusan Murphy / Christie Ross vs Megan Schemmel / Betsy Berst2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.5,4.0,4.5 Tri Level have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.49 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.03
Jackie Stahl
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.99
Erin Hambrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Sarah Taber
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.84
Jennifer VanMeter
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.76
Dina Mitchell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.55
Vanessa Watkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.45
Jessie Pullins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.39
Christie Ross
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.39
Jennifer Hudson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
KALEE WOOD
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Christy Mayo
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.25
Tricia Boushka
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Sonia Crim
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Nancy MacK
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Susan Murphy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Mayer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer VanMeter + Sarah Taber9456% games+10.1% vs expected
Dina Mitchell + Jackie Stahl2348% games+8.3% vs expected
Christy Mayo + Jennifer Hudson8352% games+4.2% vs expected
Jessie Pullins + Jennifer Hudson12853% games+0.3% vs expected
Sonia Crim + Jennifer VanMeter6165% gamesnot enough data
Sonia Crim + Tricia Boushka134 matchesnot enough data
Jessie Pullins + Christy Mayo224 matchesnot enough data
Dina Mitchell + Erin Hambrick224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jackie Stahl
130W–58L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
4.03
Erin Hambrick
130W–57L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.99
Sarah Taber
68W–60L career · 3 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.85
Jennifer VanMeter
133W–108L career · 3 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
3.84
Dina Mitchell
154W–77L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%3%97%
3.76
Vanessa Watkins
76W–68L career · 3 lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
3.55
Jessie Pullins
39W–31L career · 2 lines in 2025
63%37%<1%
3.45
3.5
Christie Ross
40W–40L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.39
Jennifer Hudson
33W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
78%22%<1%
3.39
KALEE WOOD
49W–36L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
4
Christy Mayo
32W–27L career · 3 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
3.33
Tricia Boushka
50W–83L career · 2 lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.25
Sonia Crim
47W–69L career · 2 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Nancy MacK
24W–46L career · 2 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
Susan Murphy
80W–130L career · 1 line in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.98
Susan Mayer
17W–21L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.