Teams

KY/LEX/Martin

2023 USTA LEAGUE 40 & Over SOUTHERN COMBO DOUBLES LEXINGTO · 7.5 ADULT WOMEN

19 players · average NTRP 3.50 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 7.5 ADULT WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.43 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.85
Katie Parrish
published
3.75
3.56
Tammy Mitchell
published
3.54
Carmen Amato
published 3.5
3.53
Julia Stevens
published
3.44
Kavonne B. Webb
published
3.41
Teela Watts
published
3.40
Emily Diehl
published
3.30
Ikuko Nakanishi
published
3.29
Robin Fergusson
published
3.27
Mary Cole
published
Amy Luchsinger
published 3.5
3.16
Nancy Bailey
published
3.09
Martha Martin
published
Dorothy Meng
published
Lola Baker
published
Nancy Frederick
published
Sandra Watts-Ryan
published
Tami Neal
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elizabeth Montgomery + Nancy Bailey3256% games+8.5% vs expected
Elizabeth Montgomery + Carmen Amato7163% games+4.0% vs expected
Tammy Mitchell + Mary Cole3448% games+4.0% vs expected
Elizabeth Montgomery + Kavonne B. Webb2345% games−4.2% vs expected
Nancy Bailey + Carmen Amato2341% games−4.6% vs expected
Kavonne B. Webb + Nancy Bailey044 matchesnot enough data
Lola Baker + Ikuko Nakanishi213 matchesnot enough data
Kavonne B. Webb + Carmen Amato303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Parrish
23W–9L career · no lines in 2023
1%84%15%
3.85
Elizabeth Montgomery
24W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%4%96%
3.75
Tammy Mitchell
3W–8L career · no lines in 2023
33%67%<1%
3.56
3.5
Carmen Amato
37W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%40%60%
3.54
Julia Stevens
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
Kavonne B. Webb
16W–16L career · no lines in 2023
<1%67%33%
3.44
Teela Watts
17W–11L career · no lines in 2023
<1%75%25%
3.41
Emily Diehl
69W–33L career · no lines in 2023
<1%77%23%
3.40
Ikuko Nakanishi
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
92%8%<1%
3.30
Robin Fergusson
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
94%6%<1%
3.29
Mary Cole
7W–14L career · no lines in 2023
95%5%<1%
3.27
3.5
Amy Luchsinger
6W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Bailey
16W–16L career · no lines in 2023
13%86%1%
3.16
Martha Martin
9W–8L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.09
Dorothy Meng
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Lola Baker
6W–13L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Frederick
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandra Watts-Ryan
5W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tami Neal
3W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.