Teams

OC Irvine GP - Leslie - 930 SC

2025 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday

22 players · average NTRP 3.70 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2025-09-05vs OC Lifetime RSC - Chrissy/CrosbyWon 21
W#1 DoublesKelly Dishno / Dara Luangpraseut vs Christine Parry / Shelby Houle6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNikki Bartlette / Shiva Shokouhi vs Elizabeth Harris / Christy Tuverson6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesShirin Hellmold / Sandy Sinden vs Jeanette Delaney / Mariah Velasco2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2025-08-15vs OC The Huntington Club - IdaWon 21
W#1 DoublesSara Wiens / JENNIFER BRASCH vs Shelly Hilliard / Sarah King6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLESLIE SWAN / Jodi Farrell vs Kimberly Abdelmuti / Natalie McDaniel4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesLissett MacHado / Tara Bradley vs Dana Bennett / Rosette McClave7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.24 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Becky Graham
published 4
3.60
Sara Wiens
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Kelly Dishno
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.47
Dara Luangpraseut
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.42
Gina Christiansen
published
3.37
Shiva Shokouhi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
JENNIFER BRASCH
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Nikki Bartlette
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.26
Asha Radicic
published 3.5
3.24
Leslie Boehm
published
3.22
Rita Haddad
published
3.13
Pam Schuler
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Dawn Shapiro
published 3.5
3.11
Patricia Szczuka
published
3.09
Lissett MacHado
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Kelley McBride
published
2.94
Sandy Sinden
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.92
Shirin Hellmold
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.83
Joanne Cordero
published
Jodi Farrell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
LESLIE SWAN
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Tara Bradley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nikki Bartlette + Leslie Boehm3252% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Sinden + Shirin Hellmold1446% gamesnot enough data
JENNIFER BRASCH + Becky Graham314 matchesnot enough data
Shiva Shokouhi + Nikki Bartlette213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Becky Graham
14W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.74
Sara Wiens
13W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.60
Kelly Dishno
8W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.50
4
Dara Luangpraseut
11W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Gina Christiansen
9W–0L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Shiva Shokouhi
19W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
JENNIFER BRASCH
21W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.36
Nikki Bartlette
15W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Asha Radicic
8W–12L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Leslie Boehm
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%3%
3.24
Rita Haddad
8W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
3.5
Pam Schuler
93W–60L career · 6 lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
3.13
3.5
Dawn Shapiro
6W–5L career · no lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
Patricia Szczuka
14W–7L career · no lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Lissett MacHado
9W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
Kelley McBride
14W–18L career · no lines in 2025
<1%48%52%
3.01
Sandy Sinden
16W–33L career · 1 line in 2025
68%32%<1%
2.94
Shirin Hellmold
17W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%71%29%
2.92
Joanne Cordero
6W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
Jodi Farrell
0W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
LESLIE SWAN
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Tara Bradley
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.