Teams

OC The Huntington Club - Ida

2025 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday

17 players · average NTRP 3.88 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-09-08vs OC YLCC- Sandra - Sun1Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShelly Hilliard / Ida Shu vs Holly Bruning / Deborah Miller6-7, 4-6
2025-08-29vs OC Lifetime RSC - Chrissy/CrosbyLost 01
L#1 DoublesIda Shu / Sarah King vs Marcella Cangelosi / Darcy Kendrick1-6, 4-6
2025-08-15vs OC Irvine GP - Leslie - 930 SCSplit 11
L#1 DoublesShelly Hilliard / Sarah King vs Sara Wiens / JENNIFER BRASCH3-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesKimberly Abdelmuti / Natalie McDaniel vs LESLIE SWAN / Jodi Farrell6-4, 6-4
2025-08-01vs OC LLW The Huntington Club - JoLost 01
L#1 DoublesSarah King / Ida Shu vs Christine Callas / Catherine Fullerton5-7, 5-7
2025-07-18vs OC Yorba Linda CC - MelissaWon 10
W#1 DoublesIda Shu / Sarah King vs Shelly Morgan / Claudia Spaulding6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.17
Nina Berry
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
3.87
Lori McFerren
published
3.70
Ida Shu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.61
Jane Gibb
published
3.44
Lacey Seward
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Shelly Hilliard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Annie Clark
published 3.5
3.35
Tiffany Pena
published
3.29
Mary Read
published
3.27
Natalie McDaniel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.21
Jacqueline Jernigan
published
3.20
Kimberly Abdelmuti
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.17
Hongmei Cui
published
3.09
Rosette McClave
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Linda Vu
published
Jacqueline Luther
published
Stephanie Buccella
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Natalie McDaniel + Kimberly Abdelmuti5160% games+12.0% vs expected
Jacqueline Jernigan + Annie Clark4548% games−0.4% vs expected
Hongmei Cui + Linda Vu224 matchesnot enough data
Lori McFerren + Nina Berry213 matchesnot enough data
Ida Shu + Lacey Seward213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Nina Berry
112W–62L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
Lori McFerren
24W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%18%
3.87
4
Ida Shu
61W–66L career · 4 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.70
Jane Gibb
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
21%78%<1%
3.61
3.5
Lacey Seward
95W–61L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%65%34%
3.44
Shelly Hilliard
8W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.43
3.5
Annie Clark
6W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.42
Tiffany Pena
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
1%86%14%
3.35
Mary Read
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
Natalie McDaniel
16W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.27
Jacqueline Jernigan
7W–19L career · no lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Kimberly Abdelmuti
16W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%8%92%
3.20
Hongmei Cui
20W–18L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Rosette McClave
36W–37L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%26%74%
3.09
Linda Vu
13W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%79%21%
2.89
Jacqueline Luther
4W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Stephanie Buccella
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.