Teams

OC LLW The Huntington Club - Jo

2025 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday

20 players · average NTRP 3.60 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#2 DoublesNancy Shih / Alicia Logan vs Shiva Shokouhi / Nikki Bartlette4-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-09-05vs OC The Huntington Club - IdaWon 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Kimmes / Michelle Bachand vs Stephanie Buccella / Mary Read6-2, 6-3
2025-08-15vs OC YLCC- Sandra - Sun1Won 10
W#2 DoublesAlicia Logan / Nancy Shih vs Nancy Montez / Monica Kirby6-2, 6-3
2025-08-08vs OC Irvine GP - Leslie - 930 SCWon 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Kimmes / Janna McConnell vs Dara Luangpraseut / Kelly Dishno6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-08-01vs OC HB Aces - Cheryl - Sat1130Won 10
W#2 DoublesRosalinda Fazio / Lauren Prelesnik vs Jacqueline Jernigan / Annie Clark6-2, 6-3
2025-07-25vs OC Lifetime RSC - Chrissy/CrosbyWon 30
W#1 DoublesChristine Callas / Kathy Kelly vs Susan Brooks / Kathy Salter6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCarmen Johnson / Natalie Croswell vs Carolyn Soriano / Chrissy Bird7-5, 2-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesBarbara Sladeck / Tara Steele vs Christa Long / Jeanine Bast6-2, 6-2
2025-07-11vs OC YLCC- Sandra - Sun1Won 10
W#2 DoublesRosalinda Fazio / Lauren Prelesnik vs Mischa King / Sandra Barnette6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.21 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Catherine Fullerton
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Christine Callas
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Lindsay Kimmes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.64
Janna McConnell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Nancy Shih
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.53
Rosalinda Fazio
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Lauren Prelesnik
published
3.44
Alicia Logan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.42
Josephine Garrett
published
3.36
Michaela Vitrano
published
3.34
Carmen Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Natalie Croswell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Samantha Bloom
published
3.11
Barbara Sladeck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Tara Steele
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.87
TARA COKER
published
2.80
Anita Baron
published 3
2.67
Marcela Pinzon
published
2.59
Brande Hune
published 3
2.48
Jennifer Urian
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Shih + Alicia Logan16456% games+3.0% vs expected
Marcela Pinzon + TARA COKER16854% games+1.9% vs expected
Rosalinda Fazio + Lauren Prelesnik2542% games−1.0% vs expected
Rosalinda Fazio + Alicia Logan2332% gamesnot enough data
Rosalinda Fazio + Nancy Shih314 matchesnot enough data
Alicia Logan + Michaela Vitrano404 matchesnot enough data
Lindsay Kimmes + Josephine Garrett123 matchesnot enough data
TARA COKER + Tara Steele213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Catherine Fullerton
92W–51L career · 6 lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Christine Callas
2W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
4
Lindsay Kimmes
40W–45L career · 2 lines in 2025
14%86%<1%
3.64
Janna McConnell
8W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
14%85%<1%
3.64
4
Nancy Shih
67W–52L career · 2 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
4
Rosalinda Fazio
96W–130L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.53
Lauren Prelesnik
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
65%35%<1%
3.45
3.5
Alicia Logan
48W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%67%32%
3.44
Josephine Garrett
7W–19L career · no lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
3.42
Michaela Vitrano
12W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%13%
3.36
3.5
Carmen Johnson
18W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
3.34
Natalie Croswell
11W–13L career · 1 line in 2025
2%94%3%
3.26
Samantha Bloom
3W–6L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Barbara Sladeck
8W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.11
Tara Steele
13W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%81%18%
2.88
TARA COKER
26W–26L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Anita Baron
13W–20L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
2.80
Marcela Pinzon
17W–14L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Brande Hune
7W–21L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
2.59
Jennifer Urian
3W–12L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.