Teams

OC YLCC- Sandra - Sun1

2025 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekend

22 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-09-08vs OC The Huntington Club - IdaWon 10
W#1 DoublesHolly Bruning / Deborah Miller vs Shelly Hilliard / Ida Shu7-6, 6-4
L#1 DoublesHolly Bruning / Emily Lee vs Genesis Arreola / Eileen MacKenzie6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2025-08-09vs OC LNRC - DevonLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristen Petrovacki / Holly Bruning vs Stacy Ison / Ayako Hasegawa5-7, 5-7
2025-07-26vs OC HB Aces - Cheryl - Sat1130Lost 12
L#1 DoublesNatalie St Germain / Debbie Lutz vs Cheryl Gates / Janna McConnell2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Patel / Christina Case vs Claire Hirt / Carmen Johnson4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesShannon Langpap / Teresa Yochum vs Kimberly Abdelmuti / Barbara Sladeck6-1, 6-1
2025-07-25vs OC Irvine GP - Leslie - 930 SCWon 10
W#1 DoublesHolly Bruning / Natalie St Germain vs Sara Wiens / JENNIFER BRASCH6-3, 6-4
2025-07-20vs OC Newport Beach TC - ChristinaLost 01
L#1 DoublesKristen Petrovacki / Natalie St Germain vs Indrani Jackson / Michele Savoie7-6, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 DoublesHolly Bruning / Laura Whitten vs Emily McKinney / Kerry Wessel3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women - 3.0 - 3.5 - 4.0 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.20 estimated across 21 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.94
Kristen Petrovacki
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.90
Candice Myers
published 4
3.84
Holly Bruning
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.49
Emily Lee
published 3.5
3.47
Natalie St Germain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Shannon Langpap
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Sandra Patel
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.23
Mischa King
published
3.23
Laura Whitten
published
3.20
Debbie Lutz
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.17
Christina Case
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Nicole Reed
published
3.09
Nancy Montez
published
3.04
Teresa Yochum
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Melissa McCullough
published
2.96
Christin Raymond
published 3
2.92
Gina Moore
published 3
2.89
Robin Briggs
published
2.83
Jennifer Nieto
published
2.72
Susan Leonardi
published
2.50
Karin Altonaga
published
Annie Sahyoun
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Robin Briggs + Susan Leonardi3549% games+6.7% vs expected
Christina Case + Sandra Patel61144% games+0.1% vs expected
Melissa McCullough + Sandra Patel224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kristen Petrovacki
134W–41L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%68%32%
3.94
4
Candice Myers
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
3.90
4
Holly Bruning
73W–65L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%89%11%
3.84
3.5
Emily Lee
25W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
Natalie St Germain
6W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
60%40%<1%
3.47
Shannon Langpap
13W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%10%
3.33
Sandra Patel
13W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
1%93%5%
3.29
Mischa King
16W–7L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
Laura Whitten
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
3.23
4
Debbie Lutz
1W–9L career · 1 line in 2025
99%1%<1%
3.20
3.5
Christina Case
11W–26L career · 1 line in 2025
9%90%1%
3.17
Nicole Reed
8W–5L career · no lines in 2025
18%81%<1%
3.12
Nancy Montez
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
24%76%<1%
3.09
Teresa Yochum
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Melissa McCullough
22W–18L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
3.01
3
Christin Raymond
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
3
Gina Moore
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.92
Robin Briggs
7W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.89
Jennifer Nieto
12W–17L career · no lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.83
Susan Leonardi
9W–19L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.72
Karin Altonaga
4W–9L career · no lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
2.50
2.5
Annie Sahyoun
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.