Teams

Team Hodge

2023 NMI Adult 40&O · 2023 NMI Adult 40&O 4.0W

7 players · average NTRP 3.75 / NORTHERN MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-01-29vs Team Cooper/ StivaniWon 30
W#1 DoublesMary Pomeroy / Linda Gillam vs Leslie Cooper / Rachel Stivani6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesNancy Schaefer / Barbara Hodge vs Kristy Kurjan / Sandra Johnson6-1, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesDarlene Germaine / Stefee Kim vs Erica Stegenga / Shaun Schneider2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2023-01-29vs Team LaFaveLost 12
L#1 DoublesJulie Povolo / Stefee Kim vs Tina Blackman / Susan Lahti3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Gillam / Nancy Schaefer vs Melanie LaFave / Louise Burg2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesBarbara Hodge / Mary Pomeroy vs Jana Phillips / Judith McDonagh6-0, 6-2
2023-01-28vs Team LaFaveLost 03
L#1 DoublesBarbara Hodge / Julie Povolo vs Louise Burg / Melanie LaFave3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesStefee Kim vs Jill Mcparlan2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesLinda Gillam / Mary Pomeroy vs Susan Lahti / Tina Blackman2-6, 3-6
2023-01-27vs Team Cooper/ StivaniWon 21
L#1 SinglesBarbara Hodge vs Robin Furlong3-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesStefee Kim / Linda Gillam vs Kristy Kurjan / Shaun Schneider6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesMary Pomeroy / Nancy Schaefer vs Rebecca Galsterer / Sandra Johnson5-1
2019-05-05vs Team LaFaveSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDiane Wheelock / Mary Pomeroy vs Karen Makowski / Denise Urban7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesRachel Stivani / Barbara Hodge vs Jackie Rindfusz / Leah Collie1-6, 6-7
2019-04-14vs Team LaFaveSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJennifer Patten / Mary Pomeroy vs Karen Makowski / Sue Green7-5, 5-7, 1-0
L#2 SinglesBarbara Hodge vs Jill Mcparlan1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2023 NMI Adult 40&O 4.0W have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.53 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Barbara Hodge
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.33
Darlene Germaine
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Julie Povolo
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Linda Gillam
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Mary Pomeroy
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Nancy Schaefer
published
Stefee Kim
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stefee Kim + Darlene Germaine224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Barbara Hodge
11W–33L career · 5 lines in 2023
3%95%2%
3.74
3.5
Darlene Germaine
21W–22L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.33
Julie Povolo
1W–21L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Linda Gillam
3W–14L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
Mary Pomeroy
6W–8L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Schaefer
6W–10L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Stefee Kim
16W–18L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.