Teams

GEPTA/55&over/7.0W/Viramontes/TW

SouthernNewMexico · 2026 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE

17 players · average NTRP 3.60 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2026-07-26Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKati Hunyadi / Christina Lanza vs Tina Gute / Susan Daw6-2, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-28Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLilly Gutierrez Molina / Christina Lanza vs Blanca Olmos / Ana Dominguez0-6, 1-6
2026-06-21Lost 01
L#2 DoublesChristina Lanza / Lilly Gutierrez Molina vs Gerla Gallardo / Ursula Morawietz3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2026 USA ADULT 55 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Christina Lanza
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.27
Becky Mowad
usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #3 Doubles 18% · published 3.5
3.26
Annette Segesman
usually #3 Doubles 46%, also #2 Doubles 36% · published 3.5
Catherine Nicholson Parker
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Angelina Colquitt
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 32% · published 3.5
Jennifer Viramontes
usually #1 Doubles 70%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Kati Hunyadi
usually #2 Doubles 45%, also #1 Doubles 38% · published
Kelly Upson
usually #1 Doubles 77%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
Laura Orozco
usually #3 Doubles 47%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Lia Shelton
usually #1 Doubles 45%, also #1 Singles 28% · published
Lilly Gutierrez Molina
usually #1 Doubles 41%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Linda Kern
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Lucy Pfirman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Marykathleen Towle
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 26% · published
Michele Cicchetti
usually #2 Doubles 41%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Sandra David
usually #3 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 19% · published
Thelma Campos
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 47% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Thelma Campos + Annette Segesman81249% games+5.5% vs expected
Laura Orozco + Becky Mowad0832% games−8.0% vs expected
Kelly Upson + Becky Mowad2444% games−12.7% vs expected
Linda Kern + Angelina Colquitt101647% games−19.0% vs expected
Jennifer Viramontes + Becky Mowad101248% gamesnot enough data
Angelina Colquitt + Lucy Pfirman5647% gamesnot enough data
Laura Orozco + Marykathleen Towle3541% gamesnot enough data
Kati Hunyadi + Lilly Gutierrez Molina7073% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Christina Lanza
19W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
83%17%<1%
3.37
3.5
Becky Mowad
47W–61L career · 17 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
Annette Segesman
50W–49L career · 22 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
3.26
3.5
Catherine Nicholson Parker
15W–12L career · type A · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3.5
Angelina Colquitt
58W–61L career · 22 lines in 2026
13%87%1%
3.16
Jennifer Viramontes
43W–37L career · 20 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kati Hunyadi
76W–65L career · 47 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kelly Upson
45W–40L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Laura Orozco
51W–109L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lia Shelton
141W–90L career · 39 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lilly Gutierrez Molina
38W–32L career · 41 lines in 2026
not enough data
Linda Kern
37W–31L career · 15 lines in 2026
not enough data
Lucy Pfirman
18W–21L career · 10 lines in 2026
not enough data
Marykathleen Towle
41W–84L career · 26 lines in 2026
not enough data
Michele Cicchetti
47W–110L career · 27 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandra David
26W–37L career · 16 lines in 2026
not enough data
Thelma Campos
50W–51L career · 17 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.