Teams

Team 10 Courtmasters 3.5

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.60 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2022-04-10vs Team 2 Arlington AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesTom Tran Nguyen / Vijay Kalanadhabhatta vs Frank Pan / Mikhail Velasco6-0, 6-2
2022-03-27vs Team 9 D. KongSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTom Tran Nguyen / Kursat Yavuz vs Stephen Dupuy / Saurbh Chhabra7-5, 3-1
L#2 DoublesVijay Kalanadhabhatta / Nelson Lobo vs Arturo Garcia Alonso / John Armati6-3, 1-6, 0-1
2022-03-11Won 10
W#1 SinglesVijay Kalanadhabhatta vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-03-07vs Team 6 Wise AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesTom Tran Nguyen / Raphael Soberano vs Joseph Jacangelo / Nick Mariotti6-3, 6-7
2022-02-21vs Team 5Won 10
W#1 DoublesVijay Kalanadhabhatta / Kursat Yavuz vs Byron Pickard / John Sherner6-2, 6-4
2022-02-14vs Team 4 Lorton LionsLost 01
L#1 DoublesVijay Kalanadhabhatta / Laurent Zazzera vs Alex Bennett / Eyad Abuhamda4-6, 5-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Vijay Kalanadhabhatta
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.45
Tom Tran Nguyen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.41
Tezcan Inanlar
published 4
3.40
Laurent Zazzera
published
3.23
Carlo Pizarro
published 3.5
3.16
Louis Dupuis
published
3.11
Nelson Lobo
published
2.91
Ilya Shapiro
published 3
Kursat Yavuz
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vijay Kalanadhabhatta + Tom Tran Nguyen213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Vijay Kalanadhabhatta
105W–75L career · 5 lines in 2022
5%94%1%
3.71
3.5
Tom Tran Nguyen
70W–73L career · 3 lines in 2022
<1%65%35%
3.45
4
Tezcan Inanlar
39W–46L career · type A · no lines in 2022
76%24%<1%
3.41
Laurent Zazzera
62W–40L career · no lines in 2022
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Carlo Pizarro
7W–9L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Louis Dupuis
6W–19L career · no lines in 2022
11%89%<1%
3.16
Nelson Lobo
2W–9L career · no lines in 2022
20%80%<1%
3.11
3
Ilya Shapiro
11W–4L career · no lines in 2022
<1%75%25%
2.91
Kursat Yavuz
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.