Teams

Team 6 Wise Aces

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men

11 players · average NTRP 3.30 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-04-09vs Team 1 WGCC-A2Won 10
W#2 DoublesTerry Saeger / Nick Mariotti vs Steve Fountaine / Brett Loper6-4, 6-3
2022-03-28vs Team 4 Lorton LionsLost 01
L#1 DoublesTimothy DeCamp / Terry Saeger vs Jonathan Kim / Eyad Abuhamda2-6, 3-6
2022-03-21Won 10
W#2 DoublesJoseph Jacangelo / Nick Mariotti vs Daniel Hurley / Kenneth Wickett6-3, 6-3
2022-03-13Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJoseph Jacangelo / Andrew Lyons vs Wesley Stien / Stephen Jones4-6, 3-6
2022-03-07vs Team 10 Courtmasters 3.5Split 11
L#1 DoublesJoseph Jacangelo / Nick Mariotti vs Tom Tran Nguyen / Raphael Soberano3-6, 7-6
W#2 DoublesTerry Saeger / Jeffrey Schreibman vs Louis Dupuis / Brendan O'Neil6-2, 6-3
2022-02-05vs Team 8 Next RideWon 10
W#2 DoublesTerry Saeger / Andrew Lyons vs Shanmuganathan Arumugam / Carter Wilkinson6-4, 6-4
2022-01-30vs Team 7 District AcesSplit 11
L#1 DoublesJoseph Jacangelo / Timothy DeCamp vs Jonathan Ramseur / Frank Leonard2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJeffrey Gill / Terry Saeger vs STEPHEN ROMIG / Charles Park6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Nick Mariotti
published
3.40
Jeffrey Gill
published
3.37
Jeffrey Schreibman
published
3.36
Eric Hopkins
published 3.5
3.34
Timothy DeCamp
published
3.26
Douglas Thede
published 3.5
3.03
Joseph Jacangelo
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.99
Terry Saeger
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Andrew Lyons
published 3
Jason Olson
published
Nabil Ghadiali
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Nick Mariotti
63W–36L career · no lines in 2022
<1%50%50%
3.50
Jeffrey Gill
7W–5L career · no lines in 2022
<1%78%22%
3.40
Jeffrey Schreibman
4W–3L career · no lines in 2022
<1%84%16%
3.37
3.5
Eric Hopkins
10W–9L career · no lines in 2022
<1%86%14%
3.36
Timothy DeCamp
26W–30L career · no lines in 2022
<1%89%11%
3.34
3.5
Douglas Thede
4W–4L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%3%
3.26
3
Joseph Jacangelo
155W–162L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%42%58%
3.03
3.5
Terry Saeger
77W–96L career · 5 lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Andrew Lyons
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Jason Olson
31W–30L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Nabil Ghadiali
0W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.