Teams

V - DAM Ball WACkers

2023 USTA Mixed 40 &Over · V - Mixed 7.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
L#1 DoublesBeth Bearer / Tim Bearer vs Lauren Napoli / Jim Brown4-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLaura Mealer / Gary Moss vs Keressa Garland / Michael Garland6-1, 6-4
2023-05-20vs V - Las Posas LigersWon 10
W#1 DoublesBeth Bearer / Douglas Johnson vs Carrie Kelleher / JACK HAAS7-6, 6-3
2023-05-07vs V - Sunset Hot ShotsWon 10
W#3 DoublesDouglas Johnson / Beth Bearer vs John Dunlop / Susan Friedman6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMaryrose Bleier / Steven Bleier vs Aimee Stotser / JT Stotser3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesKaren Kolosieke / Douglas Johnson vs Katherine Weckhurst / Todd Weckhurst6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMaryrose Bleier / Steven Bleier vs Deborah Snyder / Adam Targum7-6, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for V - Mixed 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.93
Keely McKnight
published
3.37
Laura Mealer
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Douglas Johnson
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.30
Karakoz Williams
published
3.15
Mary Scotti
published
3.13
Maryrose Bleier
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Beth Bearer
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.10
Todd Isroelit
published
Dee Specht
published
Steven Bleier
published
Tim Bearer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Beth Bearer + Douglas Johnson3349% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Keely McKnight
18W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%69%31%
3.93
3.5
Laura Mealer
88W–86L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Douglas Johnson
70W–61L career · 7 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.34
Karakoz Williams
21W–9L career · no lines in 2023
2%91%8%
3.30
Mary Scotti
10W–13L career · no lines in 2023
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Maryrose Bleier
72W–92L career · 2 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
3.5
Beth Bearer
87W–129L career · 3 lines in 2023
23%76%<1%
3.10
Todd Isroelit
4W–6L career · no lines in 2023
24%76%<1%
3.10
Dee Specht
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Steven Bleier
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Tim Bearer
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.