Teams

The Servivors/Nagler/VNSO

2026 Team Singles 18+ SFV Fall · SFV 18+ Women 4.0 Singles

6 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings2 teams · SFV 18+ Women 4.0 Singles
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Toluca Lake Swans/Higgs/Toluca000000
2The Servivors/Nagler/VNSO000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.57 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Katie Lagen
published 3.5
3.72
Raizzi Rodriguez
published 4
3.59
Schuyler Grant
published
3.48
Elena Salinas
published 4
3.47
Mikaela Nagler
published
3.40
Claire Rifelj
published 3.5
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katie Lagen
68W–18L career · no lines in 2026
<1%4%96%
3.75
4
Raizzi Rodriguez
94W–70L career · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
3.72
Schuyler Grant
5W–10L career · no lines in 2026
26%73%<1%
3.59
4
Elena Salinas
140W–158L career · no lines in 2026
55%45%<1%
3.48
Mikaela Nagler
26W–40L career · no lines in 2026
58%42%<1%
3.47
3.5
Claire Rifelj
34W–11L career · no lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.