Teams

HFII RED

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

11 players · average NTRP 2.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-02vs EM REDWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrian Hunter / Andrew Troyer vs Joshua Wolden / Aaron Walter6-4, 6-3
2025-05-19vs WP-O NAVYLost 01
L#1 DoublesAndrew Troyer / Donald Forest vs Peter Bridgman / Nicholas Saggese6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2025-05-12vs FOX GOLDLost 01
L#2 DoublesDonald Forest / Michael Panis vs Michael Siegal / Thomas Perry4-6, 1-6
2025-05-05vs GAC BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesJessi Andrews / Donald Forest vs Andy Garrobo / Jerry Augustin2-6, 1-6
2025-04-21vs SKY BLUELost 02
L#1 DoublesDonald Forest / David Lowe vs Kevin Gallagher / Steven Mihan2-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAndrew Troyer vs Ken Gooden2-6, 2-6
2025-04-14vs HW REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesDonald Forest / Andrew Troyer vs Ethan Hughes / Ross King6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.72 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Greg Mohrman
published
2.87
Andrew Troyer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.77
Chris Tomeo
published 3
Bill Case
published 3
2.75
Jessi Andrews
published
2.74
Josh Haynes
published
2.73
Matthew Linnell
published
2.67
Donald Forest
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.51
John Hiner
published
2.40
Bradley Cole
published 2.5
Michael Panis
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bradley Cole + John Hiner2349% games−2.3% vs expected
Donald Forest + Andrew Troyer213 matchesnot enough data
Donald Forest + Bill Case033 matchesnot enough data
Josh Haynes + Bradley Cole123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Greg Mohrman
17W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Andrew Troyer
24W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%83%17%
2.87
3
Chris Tomeo
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.77
3
Bill Case
4W–7L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Jessi Andrews
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
2.75
Josh Haynes
7W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.74
Matthew Linnell
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
3
Donald Forest
38W–82L career · 5 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
John Hiner
3W–10L career · no lines in 2025
46%54%<1%
2.51
2.5
Bradley Cole
6W–14L career · no lines in 2025
0%75%25%
2.40
Michael Panis
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.