Teams

FOX GOLD

2025 USTA ADULT 18 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-05-29vs SKY BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesKevin Gilson / Lyle Olson vs Douglas Poirier / Jon Kalstein2-6, 4-6
2025-05-24vs HV REDLost 01
L#2 SinglesKevin Gilson vs Erik Strock5-7, 7-6, 1-0
2025-05-19vs GAC BLUELost 01
L#3 DoublesThomas Perry / Kevin Gilson vs Jason Wagner / Jim Lord0-6, 1-6
2025-05-12vs HFII REDLost 01
L#1 DoublesKevin Gilson / Jason Sarno vs Chris Tomeo / Brian Hunter1-6, 4-6
2025-04-28vs HW REDWon 10
W#2 DoublesScott Alvarez / Kevin Gilson vs Peter Albro / Tim Poindexter7-6, 6-4
2025-04-14vs WP-O NAVYLost 23
L#1 DoublesKevin Gilson / Thomas Perry vs Peter Bridgman / Alec Desaulniers1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMichael Siegal vs Isaiah Straubel3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTim Haar / Matt Canetto vs John Xenakis / Dhruv Wadhwa6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesScott Alvarez vs Nicholas Saggese4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDave Lautner / Zachary Hummel vs Daniel Sierra / Joe Nguyen2-6, 6-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MEN 3.0 - 18 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.83 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Michael Siegal
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.11
Jason Sarno
published
2.87
Scott Alvarez
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.85
Lyle Olson
published
2.84
Matt Canetto
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.78
Tim Haar
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Kevin Gilson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.47
Zachary Hummel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Sarno + Michael Siegal4261% games+18.2% vs expected
Scott Alvarez + Matt Canetto3258% games+12.2% vs expected
Tim Haar + Zachary Hummel1437% games−10.7% vs expected
Kevin Gilson + Lyle Olson134 matchesnot enough data
Kevin Gilson + Tim Haar123 matchesnot enough data
Lyle Olson + Tim Haar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michael Siegal
24W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
3%93%4%
3.26
Jason Sarno
17W–6L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
3.11
Scott Alvarez
29W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%82%18%
2.87
Lyle Olson
15W–29L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Matt Canetto
17W–24L career · 1 line in 2025
1%86%13%
2.84
Tim Haar
20W–22L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Kevin Gilson
27W–49L career · 6 lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
2.48
Zachary Hummel
7W–17L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.47

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.