Teams

#2 (JEFF'S TEAM)

2022 NTA ADULT 65 & OVER LEAGUE · 8.0 MEN

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-09-08vs NV/SMITH/65&OVERM8.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDino Mendicino / Stephen Newell vs John Rodrigues / Jean Kempner0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKent Roesner / Terry Jones vs Michael Villani / John Schwikert2-6, 2-6
2022-08-30vs NV/SMITH/65&OVERM8.0Lost 02
L#1 DoublesDino Mendicino / Stephen Newell vs Dean Low / John Fish4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesGary Miller / Michael Miller vs Jean Kempner / Stephen Spelman4-6, 4-6
2022-08-27vs NV/SMITH/65&OVERM8.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDino Mendicino / Stephen Newell vs John Rodrigues / Jean Kempner3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAbsalom Alcaraz / Gary Miller vs John Fish / Stephen Spelman3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKent Roesner / Terry Jones vs Mark Smith / Phil Aurbach1-6, 2-6
2022-08-23vs NV/SMITH/65&OVERM8.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDino Mendicino / Meynardo Sanchez vs Stephen Spelman / Mark Smith1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGary Miller / Michael Miller vs Phil Aurbach / Jean Kempner3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesKent Roesner / Terry Jones vs John Rodrigues / John Fish5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 8.0 MEN
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NV/SMITH/65&OVERM8.040120149
2#2 (JEFF'S TEAM)0401224141

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.92
Jeff Girmus
published 4
Dino Mendicino
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3.5
3.10
Gary Miller
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
2.92
Absalom Alcaraz
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
Kent Roesner
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Meynardo Sanchez
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Stephen Newell
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dino Mendicino + Stephen Newell3845% gamesnot enough data
Dino Mendicino + Gary Miller1438% gamesnot enough data
Absalom Alcaraz + Gary Miller224 matchesnot enough data
Absalom Alcaraz + Dino Mendicino213 matchesnot enough data
Kent Roesner + Dino Mendicino033 matchesnot enough data
Meynardo Sanchez + Dino Mendicino213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Jeff Girmus
172W–48L career · no lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
3.92
3.5
Dino Mendicino
79W–105L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Gary Miller
105W–149L career · 7 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.10
3
Absalom Alcaraz
59W–90L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%74%26%
2.92
Kent Roesner
17W–35L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Meynardo Sanchez
20W–16L career · 3 lines in 2022
not enough data
Stephen Newell
32W–29L career · 8 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.