Teams

NTC-Phelan

2021 One Doubles · 4.0 Men

4 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-08-14vs BAMF 2021Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRick Eberhardt / Spenser Phelan vs Daniel Nickel / Audley Becker3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-08-13vs HartvigsonLost 01
L#1 DoublesRick Eberhardt / Spenser Phelan vs Matthew Dannemiller / Todd Raymond1-6, 2-6
2021-08-03vs EarthWindFireLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlen Chen / Spenser Phelan vs Anh Tuan Hoang / Kevin Nguyen0-6, 6-3, 0-1
2021-07-28vs MacLiuLost 01
L#1 DoublesRick Eberhardt / Spenser Phelan vs Michael Liu / Irvin MacQuarrie1-6, 2-6
2021-07-27vs Team Gipson/EderWon 10
W#1 DoublesSuraj Devasthali / Rick Eberhardt vs Christopher Gipson / Dan Eder6-2, 7-5
2021-07-08vs HopscotchersLost 01
L#1 DoublesAlen Chen / Suraj Devasthali vs Tue Khuc / Daniel Nguyen6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-06-29vs Night is dark & full of errorsLost 01
L#1 DoublesRick Eberhardt / Spenser Phelan vs Andrew Choi / Jonathan Lai2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings14 teams · 4.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Night is dark & full of errors7070452
2Serve Aces6060120
3Hartvigson6161233
4Tigers-Saini4242445
5EarthWindFire4242649
6F&I3333645
7MacLiu3333650
8BAMF 20212222539
9Kingsgate2424961
10Dynamic Dingles Duo1414857
11Hopscotchers15151171
12NTC-Phelan16161275
13Team Gipson/Eder16161280
14Higashi05051060

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Alen Chen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Spenser Phelan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.66
Rick Eberhardt
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.63
Suraj Devasthali
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Alen Chen + Suraj Devasthali5457% games+3.2% vs expected
Rick Eberhardt + Suraj Devasthali2445% games−8.2% vs expected
Rick Eberhardt + Spenser Phelan2837% games−9.7% vs expected
Rick Eberhardt + Alen Chen2345% gamesnot enough data
Alen Chen + Spenser Phelan123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Alen Chen
45W–51L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Spenser Phelan
31W–32L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
4
Rick Eberhardt
64W–112L career · 5 lines in 2021
11%89%<1%
3.66
4
Suraj Devasthali
27W–34L career · 2 lines in 2021
16%84%<1%
3.63

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.