Search

Spenser Phelan

Seattle, WA
4.0C year-end 2025
63 matches · 31W–32L · seasons 20192025
Where Spenser sits
79
2.5
852
3.0
1347
3.5
980
4.0
435
4.5
80
5.0

Spenser is one of 980 men at 4.0 in this cohort of 3773. Levels at or below 4.0 account for 86% of them. Shown for men only: NTRP is a gender-specific standard, so a pooled curve would compare against the wrong bar.

Over timerating by season, and how you rank
Rating by season

Spenser has been 4.0 for all 7 seasons on record, but moved a long way inside it — from the bottom of the band to the middle.

3.54.02019202020212022202320242025

The line is our estimate; the horizontal lines are level boundaries, so crossing one is a bump. Hollow points are years we inferred from the level played the following season, because USTA publishes a current rating but no history. The smaller, faded points — 2020, 2023, 2025 — rest on fewer than 5 matches, where the estimate is mostly the level the player was entered at rather than anything they did on court. Read the shape, not the value.

How you rank at your level
At 4.0, Spenser has gone from the 69th to the 60th percentile of players at that level, 2019 to 2022.

Percentile compares the same level in the same season, by share of games won. Mixed is shown for context — USTA rules exclude it from your adult rating unless mixed is all you play.

By level2 levels played
4.0
52.6%
30W–27L · 52.8% of games
8.0mixed
0W–2L
not enough matches yet

Games won matters more than matches won — NTRP adjusts on margins.

Match history63 matches
W
2025-05-25 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Eric Steinwinder
0.006about as expected — took 68% of games against 66% expected
6-1, 7-5
L
2025-05-17 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.007below expectation — took 14% of games against 29% expected
6-1, 6-1
W
2025-04-25 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.009better than expected — took 92% of games against 74% expected
6-1, 6-0
W
Sam Wang
2025-03-28 · #1 Singles · 4.0
+0.066better than expected — took 75% of games against 43% expected
6-1, 6-3
L
Andrew Bagherpour
2024-06-01 · #1 Singles · 4.0
0.040below expectation — took 29% of games against 50% expected
6-3, 6-2
W
Jay Doran
2024-05-11 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.053better than expected — took 80% of games against 52% expected
6-1, 6-2
W
Timur Sadykov / Nikhit Mago
2024-05-04 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Garrett Jensen
+0.021better than expected — took 71% of games against 58% expected
6-3, 6-2
L
2024-04-28 · #1 Doubles · 4.0 · with Joseph Moore
0.003about as expected — took 44% of games against 46% expected
7-6, 7-5
L
2023-09-17 · #2 Doubles · 8.0 · with Noriko Kilambi
+0.000about as expected — took 35% of games against 39% expected
6-2, 7-5
L
2023-09-10 · #1 Doubles · 8.0 · with Nancy Chan
+0.000below expectation — took 45% of games against 55% expected
6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L
2023-05-14 · #3 Doubles · 4.0 · with Ian Guenther
0.011about as expected — took 50% of games against 54% expected
6-3, 2-6, 1-0
W
Saksham Kakar
2023-04-30 · #2 Singles · 4.0
+0.055better than expected — took 75% of games against 47% expected
6-1, 6-3
What an account addsprivate to you

Signing in lets you point an account at your own record and keep things alongside it: notes on individual matches, your racquet and string setup, restring reminders, friendly matches that never reach TennisLink, and a diary of what you changed and what happened after.

None of it is visible to anyone else. Not to other players, not on your public page, not in search. Every private table is scoped to your account at the database level, so it is enforced rather than promised. The public page you are looking at is built from USTA match results and nothing else.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Rating shown is the published USTA year-end figure; match data is from USTA TennisLink.