Teams

Beerman - N. Escowitz

2025 Polk TriLevel 18 & Over · 3.5

12 players · average NTRP 3.17 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
L#1 DoublesAmber Stolzman / Holly Worrell vs Elizabeth Stevenson / Angela Johnson3-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJennifer Chevalier / Rosa Jean vs Dionne Kohl / Kathy Borders0-6, 5-7
2025-07-09vs Auburndale Amazons - M. TrujilloWon 10
W#1 DoublesBrittany Rutherford / Amber Stolzman vs Cindy Burgess / Dang Williamson6-0, 2-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesBrittany Rutherford / Jennifer Chevalier vs Janese Dennis / Elizabeth Willers4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRosa Jean / Sara Thompson vs Anna Clark / Brittany Craig0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.85 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.41
Leilani Guinn
published
3.38
Brittany Rutherford
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Amber Stolzman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.04
Heather Padgett
published 3
3.03
Nikki Hoagland
published
2.91
Cara Geswelli
published 3
2.77
Zee Rodriguez
published
2.73
Holly Worrell
published 3
2.70
Brandy Noel
published 3
2.66
Jennifer Chevalier
published
2.42
Nicole Escowitz
published
2.35
Rosa Jean
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nicole Escowitz + Cara Geswelli5259% games+4.4% vs expected
Zee Rodriguez + Heather Padgett224 matchesnot enough data
Cara Geswelli + Heather Padgett224 matchesnot enough data
Heather Padgett + Nikki Hoagland404 matchesnot enough data
Brittany Rutherford + Heather Padgett303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Leilani Guinn
13W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%23%
3.41
3.5
Brittany Rutherford
79W–30L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Amber Stolzman
8W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Heather Padgett
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
<1%39%61%
3.04
Nikki Hoagland
27W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Cara Geswelli
11W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.91
Zee Rodriguez
6W–3L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
2.77
3
Holly Worrell
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
2.73
3
Brandy Noel
10W–5L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
2.70
Jennifer Chevalier
10W–22L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
2.66
Nicole Escowitz
15W–10L career · no lines in 2025
0%74%26%
2.42
Rosa Jean
28W–56L career · 2 lines in 2025
87%13%<1%
2.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.