Teams

Winter Haven Triple Threat - D. Kohl

2025 Polk TriLevel 18 & Over · 3.5

15 players · average NTRP 2.94 / REGION_4

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
W#1 DoublesKathy Borders / Elizabeth Stevenson vs Janese Dennis / Elizabeth Willers6-3, 6-4
2025-07-23vs Beerman - N. EscowitzWon 10
W#2 DoublesDionne Kohl / Kathy Borders vs Jennifer Chevalier / Rosa Jean6-0, 7-5
2025-07-16vs Auburndale Amazons - M. TrujilloLost 01
L#1 DoublesAngela Johnson / Nathaly Arredondo vs Maria Ramka / Tyra Hunt1-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesNathaly Arredondo / Angela Johnson vs Janet Layug / Kerrie Hall2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKathy Borders / Courtney McCrystal vs Ashley Bailey / Lauren Lloyd3-6, 4-6
2025-06-25vs Beerman - N. EscowitzLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Stevenson / Jennifer Burns vs Lauren Mason / Leilani Guinn3-6, 6-7
2025-06-18vs Auburndale Amazons - M. TrujilloLost 01
L#2 DoublesJenilee Coconato / Kathy Borders vs Amber Maloney / Gloria Murphy2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.76
Elizabeth Stevenson
published
3.38
Kathy Borders
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 38% · published 3.5
3.28
Kimberly Funk
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Dionne Kohl
published
3.12
Nathaly Arredondo
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
Jennifer Burns
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
2.86
Jenilee Coconato
published
2.83
Karen Evans
published
2.44
Adriana G.Daunt
published 2.5
2.41
Jessica Fazzini
published
2.41
Amy Tully
published 2.5
2.05
Courtney Boynton
published 2.5
1.98
Alexis Wharem
published 2.5
Kristan Sheffield
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Burns + Kathy Borders4160% games−0.9% vs expected
Alexis Wharem + Jessica Fazzini4160% gamesnot enough data
Dionne Kohl + Amy Tully303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Elizabeth Stevenson
13W–9L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
3.76
3.5
Kathy Borders
109W–75L career · 8 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.38
Kimberly Funk
106W–112L career · 1 line in 2025
2%92%6%
3.28
Dionne Kohl
27W–13L career · no lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
3.5
Nathaly Arredondo
78W–70L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Jennifer Burns
89W–64L career · 1 line in 2025
26%74%<1%
3.09
3
Courtney McCrystal
11W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%67%33%
2.94
Jenilee Coconato
8W–4L career · no lines in 2025
<1%83%16%
2.86
Karen Evans
11W–13L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
2.83
2.5
Adriana G.Daunt
11W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%67%33%
2.44
Jessica Fazzini
8W–8L career · no lines in 2025
0%75%25%
2.41
2.5
Amy Tully
16W–9L career · no lines in 2025
0%75%25%
2.41
2.5
Courtney Boynton
1W–4L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.05
2.5
Alexis Wharem
6W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.98
Kristan Sheffield
3W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.