Teams

HOA-REG-Moore/40&Over8.0MXD

40 & Over Mixed- Sept. 22-24 · 8.0 Mixed

8 players · average NTRP 4.08 / NEBRASKA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Flight standings8 teams · 8.0 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOA-REG-Moore/40&Over8.0MXD000000
2IA-REG-Blume&Despotovich000000
3KS-REG-Seitz/Ritter/40&OverMixed8.0000000
4NE-REG-Erwin/Redding000000
5OK-Reg-Woody000000
6STL-REG-Gregerson-Crawford/40&Over8.0MXD000000
7MO-REG-Palmer/40&OverMixed8.0000000
8MOWC-REG-Edwards/40&Over8.0MXD000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.13
Dina Mitchell
published 4.5
3.98
Anne Hope
published 4
3.92
Carlos Acosta
published 4.5
Dave Moore
published 4
3.67
David May
published 4
3.34
Ann Curtis
published 3.5
3.02
Marilyn Keller
published
Scott Enge
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Anne Hope + Scott Enge11259% games+6.0% vs expected
Ann Curtis + Dave Moore8653% games+5.5% vs expected
Carlos Acosta + Marilyn Keller2547% games−0.2% vs expected
Dina Mitchell + David May7254% games−6.3% vs expected
Carlos Acosta + Dina Mitchell404 matchesnot enough data
Anne Hope + David May033 matchesnot enough data
Anne Hope + Dave Moore213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dina Mitchell
174W–84L career · no lines in 2023
15%84%<1%
4.13
4
Anne Hope
130W–69L career · no lines in 2023
<1%58%42%
3.98
4.5
Carlos Acosta
76W–100L career · no lines in 2023
73%27%<1%
3.92
4
Dave Moore
30W–36L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
David May
40W–37L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.67
3.5
Ann Curtis
40W–54L career · no lines in 2023
<1%89%10%
3.34
Marilyn Keller
53W–93L career · no lines in 2023
44%56%<1%
3.02
Scott Enge
40W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.