Teams

Team 4

2022 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Summer Indoor · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.67 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-07-27vs Team 7 Net NutsLost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberlee Overdeck / Laura Naramore vs Erin Bannister / Kristen Schopp2-6, 4-5
2022-07-24vs Team 5Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMia Piansay vs Michelle Fetterman0-6, 1-6
2022-07-20vs Team 6 Over Served AGAIN 4.0Lost 01
L#1 DoublesLaura Naramore / Kimberlee Overdeck vs Mary Ann Larson / Cathy TAYLOR7-6, 1-2
2022-07-17vs Team 1Lost 01
L#1 SinglesMia Piansay vs Agnes Trice3-6, 2-6
2022-07-15vs Team 3Lost 01
L#2 DoublesLisa Steel / Mia Piansay vs Kimberley Griffith / Kate Coler7-6, 4-6, 1-0
2022-07-09vs Team 2 Sassy SmashersLost 01
L#1 SinglesKimberlee Overdeck vs Josephine Cooper7-6, 0-1
2022-07-07vs Team 8 in2WIN...we refuse to loseWon 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Pegoraro / Kimberlee Overdeck vs Sweta Jain / Leslie-Anne Levy6-1, 6-0
2022-06-29vs Team 10Won 10
W#1 DoublesKatie Pegoraro / Kimberlee Overdeck vs Lara Brandes / Beth Elrefai6-4, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 4.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.45 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.80
Laura Naramore
published
3.72
Kimberlee Overdeck
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 4
3.57
Katie Pegoraro
published
3.35
Lisa Steel
published
Donna Fitzgerald
published 3.5
3.21
Mia Piansay
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Reasmy Norin
published
Katie Humphries
published
Kristin Quackenbush
published
Lauren Rowley
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Reasmy Norin + Donna Fitzgerald1540% gamesnot enough data
Lisa Steel + Donna Fitzgerald224 matchesnot enough data
Laura Naramore + Lisa Steel213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Laura Naramore
17W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.80
4
Kimberlee Overdeck
81W–132L career · 5 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.72
Katie Pegoraro
1W–11L career · no lines in 2022
30%70%<1%
3.57
Lisa Steel
45W–43L career · no lines in 2022
<1%87%13%
3.35
3.5
Donna Fitzgerald
11W–17L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
3.5
Mia Piansay
244W–303L career · 3 lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
Reasmy Norin
9W–15L career · no lines in 2022
31%69%<1%
3.06
Katie Humphries
0W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kristin Quackenbush
20W–13L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lauren Rowley
0W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.