Teams

NAPA VALLEY TC/VINTAGE HS 18MX8.0A

2024 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX8.0

18 players · average NTRP 4.19 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 18&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.86 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.46
Dianne Maher
published 4.5
4.29
Evan Vercellini
published 4.5
4.25
Fulton Zink
published 4.5
Ethan Kincaid
published 4.5
4.09
Marie Dolcini
published
3.94
Angela Merola
published 4
3.93
Tom Kincaid
published
3.89
Lisa Dierking
published
3.81
Bryan Arbios
published 4
3.76
Shay Martin
published
3.76
Kristen Calise
published
3.68
Rachel Nickolette
published
3.52
3.50
Amanda DeBord
published 3.5
3.15
Sue Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Paul Sahim
published
Stefan Serbicki
published
Troy Rondeau
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Dianne Maher + Paul Sahim123 matchesnot enough data
Bryan Arbios + Shay Martin123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Dianne Maher
16W–2L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
4.46
4.5
Evan Vercellini
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
1%94%5%
4.29
4.5
Fulton Zink
7W–5L career · no lines in 2024
3%95%3%
4.25
4.5
Ethan Kincaid
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Marie Dolcini
14W–4L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.09
4
Angela Merola
43W–17L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
Tom Kincaid
9W–6L career · no lines in 2024
70%30%<1%
3.93
Lisa Dierking
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
81%19%<1%
3.89
4
Bryan Arbios
7W–3L career · type S · no lines in 2024
1%92%7%
3.81
Shay Martin
19W–17L career · no lines in 2024
2%94%3%
3.76
Kristen Calise
9W–7L career · no lines in 2024
2%95%3%
3.76
Rachel Nickolette
16W–10L career · no lines in 2024
8%91%1%
3.68
4
Hunter Hollingsworth
7W–3L career · no lines in 2024
43%57%<1%
3.52
3.5
Amanda DeBord
28W–13L career · no lines in 2024
<1%49%51%
3.50
Sue Taylor
55W–62L career · 6 lines in 2024
12%87%<1%
3.15
Paul Sahim
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Stefan Serbicki
2W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Troy Rondeau
2W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.