Teams

Dacia

2025 One Doubles · 3.5 Men

3 players · average NTRP 3.67 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-08-05vs Doubles InfernoWon 10
W#1 DoublesAdrian Fanaru / Ciprian Clinciu vs David Lee / Beagan Nguy6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2025-06-18vs BC-Feng-OneDoublesLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarian Stanescu / Adrian Fanaru vs Le Zhang / Ximeng Jia2-6, 1-6
2025-06-16vs Shadow StrikersLost 01
L#1 DoublesMarian Stanescu / Ciprian Clinciu vs Paul Suroteguh / Badrinath Vengalathur3-6, 6-7
2025-06-12vs BestWon 10
W#1 DoublesCiprian Clinciu / Adrian Fanaru vs Michael Best / Devesha Best5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2025-06-08vs RacketeersLost 01
L#1 DoublesCiprian Clinciu / Marian Stanescu vs Vikas Pabreja / Nik Garkusha6-7, 3-6
2025-06-06vs PTSDWon 10
W#1 DoublesCiprian Clinciu / Marian Stanescu vs Sherman Tang / Denvere Yon6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings39 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Buchanan6060022
23 Lefties Make a Rightie5050128
3AlcohooligansDubs5151240
4Anderson 1D5151338
5354life5151339
6Blowhole5151335
7Shadow Strikers5151447
8Banana Fighters V25151660
9NWW-Renteria4141230
10Hit Men4141334
11Brown Brigade4242536
12PTSD4242650
13Dribbling3232549
14Nothing but Net3232536
15The Old and the Tall3232553
16First Serves Only3232652
17BC-Feng-OneDoubles3333651
18Double Faults3333758
19Doubles Inferno3333744
20Dacia3333856
21Yuen Bros2222538
22RodBus2222545
23Put Away2323755
24Edgebrook doubles2323746
25PSC-ZHANG/ZHAO2323858
26Slices & Kicks2424856
27Business Time2424960
28TCSP Early Risers1212531
29It's Greeen1414848
30DontHitOnMyFace1414959
31Longest Road1414960
32JAa Rules1414961
33Game Set Match15151070
34Arun15151166
35Super Fun Times0303637
36Chan06061273
37Shock-and-Awe06061274
38Sirius06061267
39Camara/Nelson06061272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.46 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.71
Marian Stanescu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.38
Ciprian Clinciu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.30
Adrian Fanaru
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Marian Stanescu + Ciprian Clinciu4454% games+3.3% vs expected
Adrian Fanaru + Ciprian Clinciu121251% games+2.3% vs expected
Marian Stanescu + Adrian Fanaru224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Marian Stanescu
73W–51L career · 4 lines in 2025
5%93%1%
3.71
3.5
Ciprian Clinciu
100W–97L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Adrian Fanaru
142W–120L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
3.30

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.