Teams

PSC-ZHANG/ZHAO

2025 One Doubles · 3.5 Men

2 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-08-06vs Longest RoadWon 10
W#1 DoublesDavid Zhao / Charles Zhang vs Ethan Chung / Tyler Yezman7-5, 4-6, 1-0
2025-07-24vs 3 Lefties Make a RightieLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharles Zhang / David Zhao vs Kevin Pham / Jacob Chiang0-6, 2-6
2025-07-19vs NWW-RenteriaLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharles Zhang / David Zhao vs Lorenzo Guio / Zane Dundon2-6, 2-6
2025-07-03vs JAa RulesWon 10
W#1 DoublesCharles Zhang / David Zhao vs Andrew Paik / Justin Fu6-4, 6-7, 1-0
2025-07-02vs I'd Hit ThatLost 01
L#1 DoublesCharles Zhang / David Zhao vs Raymond Lim / Joel Nethery3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings40 teams · 3.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Buchanan6060022
23 Lefties Make a Rightie5050128
3AlcohooligansDubs5151240
4Anderson 1D5151338
5354life5151339
6Blowhole5151335
7Shadow Strikers5151447
8Banana Fighters V25151660
9NWW-Renteria4141230
10Hit Men4141334
11Court Crushers4242551
12Brown Brigade4242536
13PTSD4242650
14Dribbling3232549
15Nothing but Net3232536
16The Old and the Tall3232553
17First Serves Only3232652
18BC-Feng-OneDoubles3333651
19Double Faults3333758
20Doubles Inferno3333744
21Dacia3333856
22Yuen Bros2222538
23RodBus2222545
24Put Away2323755
25Edgebrook doubles2323746
26PSC-ZHANG/ZHAO2323858
27Slices & Kicks2424856
28Business Time2424960
29TCSP Early Risers1212531
30It's Greeen1414848
31DontHitOnMyFace1414959
32Longest Road1414960
33JAa Rules1414961
34Game Set Match15151070
35Arun15151166
36Super Fun Times0303637
37Chan06061273
38Shock-and-Awe06061274
39Sirius06061267
40Camara/Nelson06061272

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.37
Charles Zhang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.92
David Zhao
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Zhang + David Zhao41141% games−4.6% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Charles Zhang
85W–59L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%82%17%
3.37
3
David Zhao
78W–59L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.92

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.