Teams

FHCS PRIEST

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

12 players · average NTRP 2.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-14vs CCW SCOTTWon 31
W#1 DoublesMiyo Park / Alyssa Priest vs Heather Tiffany / Mary Tostanoski6-3, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLorna Gutierrez vs Marilyn McGee6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJessica Daniels / Jenny Breeding vs Margaret Hill / Millicent Geers6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTricia Asp / Beatriz Arsuaga vs Stacy Mills / Stacie Ross6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2025-07-07vs CSRC ROSSWon 31
W#1 DoublesAlyssa Priest / Miyo Park vs Allison Guinn / Ceanne Coleman6-4, 6-0
W#1 SinglesLorna Gutierrez vs Andrea Pazdera6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesJenny Breeding / Lyn Reeder vs Claire Sneed / Denice Yates5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBeatriz Arsuaga / Christine Bong vs Crystal Klausmeier / Brooke H Mitchell6-2, 6-2
2025-06-23vs CSCC PEPPERLost 13
L#1 DoublesLorna Gutierrez / Jessica Daniels vs Christine Thiele / Ronda Holton3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesMiyo Park vs Glenda Coto Meckbel6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesLyn Reeder / Amanda Tiffany vs Kathryn Seibert / Jamie Horspool2-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#3 DoublesChristine Bong / Jenny Malmgren vs Cyndy Hall / Susan Sanders2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2025-06-20vs LTFCS OSTLYLost 13
W#1 DoublesMiyo Park / Jessica Daniels vs Vicki Gess / Myrene Conner6-4, 6-1
L#1 SinglesChristine Bong vs Jenn Hull0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesJenny Breeding / Lyn Reeder vs Susan Shaink / Jane Glimco1-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Tiffany / Anne Sims vs Sarah Lueckeman / Dana Kennedy1-6, 3-6
2025-06-16vs CCOC HYMANLost 04
L#1 DoublesJenny Breeding / Jessica Daniels vs Barbara Jean Knorr / Anne Janda3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesLorna Gutierrez vs Christie Lee2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnne Sims / Christine Bong vs Suzanne Book / Irene Larimer1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAmanda Tiffany / Jenny Malmgren vs Cynthia Lund / Cody Ross2-6, 1-6
2025-06-09vs PBCP TURNERSplit 22
W#1 DoublesJenny Breeding / Lyn Reeder vs Cecily Donovan / Rochelle Wristen6-2, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJessica Daniels vs Andrea DeAngelo6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAnne Sims / Christine Bong vs Nora Day / Holly Waller6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTricia Asp / Jenny Malmgren vs Brigitte Juarez / Melanie Turner6-7, 6-3, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CCOC BONICELLI61181024226
2CCOC HYMAN5117716160
3CSRC BRENNER5219922225
4CSRC RAMSEY43151329239
5MEMPK DECAIRES43141433256
6FHCS PRIEST33101429201
7PBCP TURNER33111330231
8CSCC MCCANN16101839275
9CCW SCOTT0661839255

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.84 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.21
Miyo Park
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.93
Alyssa Priest
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.90
Lyn Reeder
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.90
Jessica Daniels
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.76
Lorna Gutierrez
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Anne Sims
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
Christine Bong
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.65
Jenny Malmgren
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.54
Beatriz Arsuaga
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Amanda Tiffany
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Jenny Breeding
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Tricia Asp
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Miyo Park + Alyssa Priest5067% games+14.1% vs expected
Lyn Reeder + Jenny Breeding123 matchesnot enough data
Jessica Daniels + Jenny Breeding213 matchesnot enough data
Jenny Breeding + Alyssa Priest123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Miyo Park
30W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3
Alyssa Priest
21W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
2.93
Lyn Reeder
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%75%24%
2.90
Jessica Daniels
14W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
Lorna Gutierrez
18W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Anne Sims
4W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Christine Bong
4W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenny Malmgren
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
14%85%1%
2.65
3
Beatriz Arsuaga
15W–22L career · type A · 2 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
2.54
2.5
Amanda Tiffany
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jenny Breeding
9W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Tricia Asp
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.