Teams

LTFCS OSTLY

2025 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - SOCO · WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-07-14vs CSCC PEPPERWon 40
W#1 DoublesJane Glimco / Amy Sauerland vs Becky Cleveland / Jennifer Smith6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesJenn Hull vs Susan Sanders6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJudi Ashmen / Sarah Lueckeman vs Glenda Coto Meckbel / Kate Doane7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMyrene Conner / Karen Schaller vs Cyndy Hall / Carol Pepper6-4, 7-5
2025-07-07vs CCOC HYMANWon 31
L#1 DoublesKaren Schaller / Myrene Conner vs Crista Clancy / Kelly Sung2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesJenn Hull vs Christie Lee6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJane Glimco / Lisa Ostly vs Suzanne Book / Michelle Erlander6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesSusan Shaink / Vicki Gess vs Jan Hyman / Irene Larimer6-4, 6-3
2025-06-30vs PBCP TURNERWon 40
W#1 DoublesJane Glimco / Lisa Ostly vs Cecily Donovan / Rochelle Wristen6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesJenn Hull vs Ana Bhagat6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Sauerland / Vicki Gess vs Melanie Turner / Brigitte Juarez6-2, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJudi Ashmen / Susan Shaink vs Holly Waller / Nora Day6-3, 7-6
2025-06-20vs FHCS PRIESTWon 31
L#1 DoublesVicki Gess / Myrene Conner vs Miyo Park / Jessica Daniels4-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesJenn Hull vs Christine Bong6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Shaink / Jane Glimco vs Jenny Breeding / Lyn Reeder6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesSarah Lueckeman / Dana Kennedy vs Amanda Tiffany / Anne Sims6-1, 6-3
2025-06-16vs CCW SCOTTWon 40
W#1 DoublesVicki Gess / Jenn Hull vs Margaret Hill / Mary Tostanoski6-0, 6-4
W#1 SinglesLisa Ostly vs Suzanne Bowland5-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSarah Lueckeman / Dana Kennedy vs Jeanne Osborn / Heather Tiffany6-4, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAmy Sauerland / Susan Shaink vs Amy Cordova / Callie Scott6-0, 6-2
2025-06-09vs CSRC ROSSWon 40
W#1 DoublesMyrene Conner / Lisa Ostly vs Allison Guinn / Ceanne Coleman7-6, 6-3
W#1 SinglesAmy Sauerland vs Melissa Foley3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesDana Kennedy / Sarah Lueckeman vs Alicia Stier / Denice Yates6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJudi Ashmen / Jane Glimco vs Crystal Klausmeier / Andrea Pazdera6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER - SOCO have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Jenn Hull
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
3.01
Judi Ashmen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.00
Jane Glimco
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.97
Vicki Gess
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.96
Susan Shaink
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.90
Karen Schaller
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Amy Sauerland
usually #1 Singles 25%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Lisa Ostly
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.76
Dana Kennedy
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.70
Myrene Conner
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Sarah Lueckeman
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Ostly + Jane Glimco15468% games+10.2% vs expected
Amy Sauerland + Lisa Ostly8363% games+8.8% vs expected
Jane Glimco + Susan Shaink29863% games+6.7% vs expected
Judi Ashmen + Susan Shaink3261% games+1.6% vs expected
Lisa Ostly + Jenn Hull5260% games−1.5% vs expected
Dana Kennedy + Judi Ashmen6160% games−2.6% vs expected
Myrene Conner + Karen Schaller9752% games−3.9% vs expected
Lisa Ostly + Susan Shaink5452% games−12.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jenn Hull
78W–29L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%6%94%
3.22
3
Judi Ashmen
62W–33L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Jane Glimco
97W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%49%51%
3.00
3
Vicki Gess
53W–56L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Susan Shaink
114W–57L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%62%38%
2.96
Karen Schaller
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%76%24%
2.90
3
Amy Sauerland
57W–32L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%77%23%
2.90
3
Lisa Ostly
123W–89L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Dana Kennedy
28W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
3%92%5%
2.76
Myrene Conner
13W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
2.70
Sarah Lueckeman
7W–0L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.