Teams

CDTA W 18&OW3.0 8.MTP Abreu Sat 2 $27

CDTA 1Winter 18 & Over W · E

10 players · average NTRP 2.80 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
L#1 SinglesVanessa Harris vs Boyang Liu0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKyra Anderson / Eleanor Abreu vs Amy Shappert / Sarah Leonard5-7, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCaroline Federighi / Mary Hojnacki vs Christina Nugent / Heather Sandler0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Lakely / Jacqueline Abreu vs Jess McKune / Leslie Brosk4-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesVanessa Harris vs Mandy Tandy6-2, 2-4, 1-0
W#1 DoublesJacqueline Abreu / Jacqueline Lakely vs Leena Bhat / Laurie Woolverton6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesDarcie Abreu vs Monika Thadhani3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Federighi / Judy Dluzen vs Frances Hopps / CHRISTINE TAN3-6, 5-7
L#1 DoublesTara Snow / Jacqueline Abreu vs Samantha Garrity / Juli Theo3-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesVanessa Harris vs Kristen Trukova3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Dluzen / Eleanor Abreu vs Jamie Rauscher / Elham Abboud4-6, 1-3
L#3 DoublesMallory Neet / Beverly Vacval vs Jean Niemi / Jing Lindsey0-6, 4-6
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Abreu / Mandy Kirk vs Michelle Charles / Kim Novak6-1, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesKyra Anderson vs Natalie Neiman7-5, 3-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesDarcie Abreu / Eleanor Abreu vs Marcia Florence / Mariana Ingersoll1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAndrea RAY / Mary Hojnacki vs Chazery Colon / Rhonda Gumbel-Thomas1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Abreu / Judy Dluzen vs Neli Alexieva / Jan James-Calvert4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Federighi / Darcie Abreu vs Andrea Sosa / Johanna Heppeler4-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesJacqueline Lakely / Kyra Anderson vs Beth Goldberg / Courtney Robson7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesDarcie Abreu vs Lelia Lanuza1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJudy Dluzen / Andrea RAY vs Kerrie Crawford / Lisa Charpentier4-6, 2-6
L#1 DoublesKyra Anderson / Jacqueline Abreu vs Angie Rush / Linda DeNardis4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeverly Vacval / Mallory Neet vs Courtney Williams / Rose Karasti6-7, 4-0, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 18&OW3.0 4.RCLB Sherman Sun 4 $227124820215
2CDTA W 18&OW3.0 5.Wlmt Tromp Sun 7 $2062201230252
3CDTA W 18&OW3.0 7.Tam Wolff Sun 3 $2262211131256
4CDTA W 18&OW3.0 9.MTB Cohen Sun 12 $2744161636247
5CDTA W 18&OW3.0 1.MTC Brown-1 Sun 2 $33.544161638288
6CDTA W 18&OW3.0 6.Wlmt Cohen Sun 3 $2044141840287
7CDTA W 18&OW3.0 2.MTC Brown-2 Sun 2 $33.535161634252
8CDTA W 18&OW3.0 3.XS Charles Sun 3 $2726112143288
9CDTA W 18&OW3.0 8.MTP Abreu Sat 2 $270862655342

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.45 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.07
2.83
Tara Snow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.70
Vanessa Harris
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.62
Jacqueline Abreu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Beverly Vacval
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.30
Judy Dluzen
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.16
Darcie Abreu
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 2.5
1.96
Mary Hojnacki
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
1.90
Andrea RAY
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Kyra Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jacqueline Lakely + Tara Snow11760% games+13.0% vs expected
Judy Dluzen + Beverly Vacval0624% gamesnot enough data
Judy Dluzen + Tara Snow2345% gamesnot enough data
Andrea RAY + Mary Hojnacki0514% gamesnot enough data
Jacqueline Lakely + Jacqueline Abreu224 matchesnot enough data
Jacqueline Lakely + Beverly Vacval044 matchesnot enough data
Judy Dluzen + Vanessa Harris134 matchesnot enough data
Judy Dluzen + Mary Hojnacki044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Jacqueline Lakely
57W–54L career · no lines in 2026
<1%31%69%
3.07
Tara Snow
33W–43L career · 6 lines in 2026
1%90%10%
2.83
Vanessa Harris
22W–34L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70
3
Jacqueline Abreu
16W–10L career · 6 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.62
3
Beverly Vacval
40W–107L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
57%43%<1%
2.48
Judy Dluzen
16W–61L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%94%6%
2.30
2.5
Darcie Abreu
2W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.16
Mary Hojnacki
5W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.96
2.5
Andrea RAY
2W–20L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.90
Kyra Anderson
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.