Teams

CDTA W 18&OW3.0 5.Wlmt Tromp Sun 7 $20

CDTA 1Winter 18 & Over W · E

15 players · average NTRP 3.05 / CHICAGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesJulie Budzynski / Natalie Kroft vs Michelle Charles / Kim Novak1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesNatalie Kroft / Courtney Robson vs Anne Feder / Jan James-Calvert6-0, 6-0
L#1 DoublesRuslana Litinskaia / Lisa Charpentier vs Julie Bell / Samantha Garrity6-7, 2-5
L#2 DoublesSimone Brown / Renee Lanam vs Amanda Ripp / Leena Bhat1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesNatalie Kroft / Erin McCarthy vs Allison Cohen / Brooke Laufer6-3, 7-5
W#2 DoublesLisa Charpentier / Janet Mital vs Amanda Marijanovic / Karen Kos7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKerrie Crawford / Lisa Charpentier vs Judy Dluzen / Andrea RAY6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesLisa Charpentier / Chris Henderson vs Molly Klein Catalano / Anita Kim6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings9 teams · E
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1CDTA W 18&OW3.0 4.RCLB Sherman Sun 4 $227124820215
2CDTA W 18&OW3.0 5.Wlmt Tromp Sun 7 $2062201230252
3CDTA W 18&OW3.0 7.Tam Wolff Sun 3 $2262211131256
4CDTA W 18&OW3.0 9.MTB Cohen Sun 12 $2744161636247
5CDTA W 18&OW3.0 1.MTC Brown-1 Sun 2 $33.544161638288
6CDTA W 18&OW3.0 6.Wlmt Cohen Sun 3 $2044141840287
7CDTA W 18&OW3.0 2.MTC Brown-2 Sun 2 $33.535161634252
8CDTA W 18&OW3.0 3.XS Charles Sun 3 $2726112143288
9CDTA W 18&OW3.0 8.MTP Abreu Sat 2 $270862655342

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.90 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Jeanne Tromp
published 3.5
3.08
Lelia Lanuza
published 3
3.02
Christie Jordan
published 3
2.97
Janet Mital
published 3
2.96
Meg Hui
published 3
2.92
Nora Jewett
published 3
2.89
Simone Brown
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Diana Atad
published 3
2.76
Lisa Charpentier
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Beth Goldberg
published 3
Chris Henderson
published 3
2.71
Angera Ma
published 3
2.44
Renee Lanam
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Erin McCarthy
published
Natalie Kroft
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lelia Lanuza + Simone Brown6080% games+18.2% vs expected
Lelia Lanuza + Christie Jordan10264% games+6.9% vs expected
Diana Atad + Simone Brown7358% games+3.9% vs expected
Diana Atad + Jeanne Tromp5356% games+3.9% vs expected
Lisa Charpentier + Simone Brown4351% games−2.5% vs expected
Renee Lanam + Jeanne Tromp3348% games−7.6% vs expected
Diana Atad + Christie Jordan3359% gamesnot enough data
Jeanne Tromp + Christie Jordan224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Jeanne Tromp
144W–60L career · no lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.28
3
Lelia Lanuza
32W–10L career · no lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
3
Christie Jordan
84W–43L career · no lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.02
3
Janet Mital
40W–77L career · no lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Meg Hui
71W–58L career · no lines in 2026
<1%60%40%
2.96
3
Nora Jewett
37W–21L career · no lines in 2026
<1%73%27%
2.92
Simone Brown
44W–29L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%78%22%
2.89
3
Diana Atad
105W–88L career · no lines in 2026
<1%83%16%
2.86
Lisa Charpentier
28W–18L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Beth Goldberg
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Chris Henderson
4W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Angera Ma
5W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
Renee Lanam
16W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
66%34%<1%
2.44
Erin McCarthy
7W–6L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Natalie Kroft
16W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.