Teams

Kingman/Scott/Nashville

2025 Adult 18 & Over - Nashville · 3.0 Women - Monday AM

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-04-28vs Ladlam/NashvilleLost 12
L#1 DoublesSusan Lonon / Samantha Reedy vs Laura Woodard / Sara Ludlam4-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLacey Fuson vs Lindsy Stempel2-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesKali Geiger / Lindsay LeBreton vs Mary Alden Brett / Elizabeth Noble0-6, 0-6
2025-04-21vs Messer/Sanford/NashvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesChelsea Kiser / Sara Beth Scott vs Jennifer Etheridge / Paula Rucks1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRyan Sedlacek / Lauren Kingman vs Abby Stewart / Merek Slagle3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesErin Hunter vs Cornelia Vance7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLayla Cochran / Lindsay LeBreton vs Tasha Freels / Shannon Sanford2-6, 2-6
2025-04-18vs Messer/Sanford/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesHolly Trepka / Samantha Reedy vs Abby Stewart / Tonya Messer2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesRyan Sedlacek vs Jenifer Lodge4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesChelsea Kiser / Erin Hunter vs Shannon Sanford / Tasha Freels5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLayla Cochran vs Rebecca Moriarity1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesLindsay LeBreton / Lacey Fuson vs Cornelia Vance / Terri Hagood3-6, 2-6
2025-04-14vs Ladlam/NashvilleLost 23
L#1 DoublesRyan Sedlacek / Holly Trepka vs Sara Ludlam / Laura Woodard3-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#1 SinglesLauren Kingman vs Amanda Fend7-5, 6-4
W#2 DoublesChelsea Kiser / Sara Beth Scott vs Kyle McCarthy Murphy / Elizabeth Noble6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLacey Fuson vs Lindsy Stempel5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesAutumn Simpson / Lindsay LeBreton vs Lynne Falk / Jane Doe5-5
2025-04-09vs Severn/NashvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesRyan Sedlacek / Samantha Reedy vs Margaret Bramlett / Deborah Epling2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLauren Kingman vs Beth Watson6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSara Beth Scott / Ann Wood vs Susan Severn / Julie Meier6-2, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLindsay LeBreton vs Stephanie Kinard2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChelsea Kiser / Erin Hunter vs Lidia Zaharcu / Carmen Greenberg6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2025-03-24vs Comstock/NashvilleSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLauren Kingman / Sara Beth Scott vs Donna Holt / Dana Latreille6-0, 6-1
L#2 DoublesAutumn Simpson / Susan Lonon vs Rebecca Baca / Brittany Stollenwerk6-2, 6-7, 0-1
L#2 SinglesLacey Fuson vs Jelena Sanford2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesErin Hunter / Layla Cochran vs Amy Coggin / Bryn Harrison6-0, 6-3
2025-03-17vs Cockrel/NashvilleWon 32
W#1 DoublesLauren Kingman / Samantha Reedy vs Jennifer Bissonnette / Zena Krupin6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRyan Sedlacek vs Eleanor McDermott6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesAnn Wood / Sara Beth Scott vs Kerry Finley / Glyna Brooks6-4, 6-1
L#2 SinglesLindsay LeBreton vs Christy Carter2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#3 DoublesErin Hunter / Autumn Simpson vs Karen Ard / Jennifer Cockrel6-3, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women - Monday AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.61 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Lauren Kingman
usually #3 Doubles 30%, also #1 Singles 30% · published
2.85
Ryan Sedlacek
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.83
Sara Beth Scott
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Autumn Simpson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
Chelsea Kiser
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Holly Trepka
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.48
Lacey Fuson
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.48
Erin Hunter
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published 3
2.33
Lindsay LeBreton
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
2.31
Layla Cochran
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Kali Geiger
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Lonon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sara Beth Scott + Ryan Sedlacek3350% games+9.5% vs expected
Sara Beth Scott + Lauren Kingman6259% games+6.3% vs expected
Lauren Kingman + Ryan Sedlacek3442% games−4.0% vs expected
Holly Trepka + Ryan Sedlacek213 matchesnot enough data
Kali Geiger + Lindsay LeBreton123 matchesnot enough data
Erin Hunter + Layla Cochran123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Kingman
33W–25L career · 10 lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.01
Ryan Sedlacek
16W–25L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%87%13%
2.85
Sara Beth Scott
16W–15L career · 7 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.83
3
Autumn Simpson
2W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Chelsea Kiser
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Holly Trepka
2W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lacey Fuson
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%55%45%
2.48
3
Erin Hunter
6W–19L career · 7 lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.48
Lindsay LeBreton
5W–20L career · 6 lines in 2025
90%10%<1%
2.33
Layla Cochran
14W–26L career · 8 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.31
Kali Geiger
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Susan Lonon
3W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.