Teams

Al.Dugan40A

2025 Capital Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2025-05-20vs As.Walker40AWon 10
W#1 DoublesKelly Talbot / Lynnsy Summitt vs Griffin Lamb / Liza Eaton3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2025-05-06vs We.Bargoil40ALost 02
L#1 SinglesLynnsy Summitt vs Genevieve Daurity1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKathan Griscik / Thassia Roschel vs Jennifer Viscosi / Wendy Bargoil2-6, 2-6
2025-05-06vs Ca.Beaird40AWon 10
W#1 SinglesLynnsy Summitt vs Jean Merta7-5, 6-7, 1-0
2025-04-29Lost 01
L#1 SinglesLynnsy Summitt vs Jennifer Roche7-5, 3-6, 0-1
2025-04-15vs Je.Solomon40AWon 10
W#2 DoublesThassia Roschel / Margaret Barham vs Perry LeGaux / Sarah Hoffman5-7, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-25vs An.Redmond40ALost 02
L#1 DoublesThassia Roschel / Kathan Griscik vs Dora Reed / Dawn Johnstone5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesLynnsy Summitt vs Leigh McClure2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-03-18vs Er.Hemminger40ALost 01
L#1 DoublesLynnsy Summitt / Kelly Talbot vs Michelle Gessner / Erin Hemminger3-6, 4-6
2025-03-11vs Hop.Pflaum40ALost 01
L#2 DoublesThassia Roschel / Allison Dugan vs Melanie Waldron / Candice Kish2-6, 4-6
2025-03-04vs Ch.Hochstrasser40AWon 10
W#1 SinglesLynnsy Summitt vs Heather Hofmann7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.97
Lynnsy Summitt
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.85
Thassia Roschel
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.75
Kelly Talbot
published
2.58
Anna Kethey
published 3
2.57
Kathan Griscik
published
2.57
Kelly Blevins
published
2.56
Allison Dugan
published 3
2.46
Margaret Barham
published
2.38
Zsuzsa Wahlen
published
2.23
Jane Bossert
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Dugan + Margaret Barham224 matchesnot enough data
Kelly Blevins + Kelly Talbot123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lynnsy Summitt
59W–36L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
3
Thassia Roschel
45W–37L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%87%12%
2.85
Kelly Talbot
6W–6L career · no lines in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Anna Kethey
4W–10L career · type A · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
2.58
Kathan Griscik
2W–2L career · no lines in 2025
0%29%71%
2.57
Kelly Blevins
12W–8L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
2.57
3
Allison Dugan
8W–9L career · no lines in 2025
33%67%<1%
2.56
Margaret Barham
16W–11L career · no lines in 2025
0%64%36%
2.46
Zsuzsa Wahlen
1W–8L career · no lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.38
Jane Bossert
10W–18L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.