Teams

SUN CITY SUMMERLIN

2023 NTA ADULT 65 & OVER LEAGUE · 7.0 WOMEN

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NEVADA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-03-16vs SPANISH TRAIL #2Won 30
W#1 DoublesBarbara Randell / Tori Rosenthal vs Pamela Rusk / Victoria Khelifi6-4, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCheryl Landholm / Jackie Seavey vs Peggy Latour / Karolyn Willoughby6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesDoreen Lono / Patricia Hawkins vs Patricia Boudier / Deborah Graham6-2, 7-6
2023-03-09vs WHITNEY MESA PARK #2Lost 12
W#1 DoublesBarbara Randell / Jackie Seavey vs Patricia Delgado / Ann Lawton6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesPatricia Hawkins / Cheryl Landholm vs Ginger Nakamura / Sara Schnabel0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesDoreen Lono / Tori Rosenthal vs Joan Chevalier / Dixie Stephens6-4, 2-6, 0-1
2023-02-23vs NV/DAVIS/65&OVER/W7.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesPatricia Hawkins / Tori Rosenthal vs Cappi Bates / Cherry Marshall7-6, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKay Higer / Jackie Seavey vs Lena Grotz / Julie Christensen6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTi Beasley / Marcela Urcia vs Terri Green / Nancy Popek3-6, 2-6
2023-02-16vs WHITNEY MESA PARK #1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesTori Rosenthal / Patricia Hawkins vs Clairen Peeters / Ingrid Fitzgerald6-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesJackie Seavey / Judith Kraus vs Rae Ann Yost / Ursula Kirschner4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesTi Beasley / Marcela Urcia vs Brenda Talley / Diane Schopp7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-02-09vs SPANISH TRAIL #2Won 21
W#1 DoublesJudith Kraus / Patricia Hawkins vs Victoria Khelifi / Jane Casovan6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesTi Beasley / Cheryl Landholm vs Peggy Latour / Sheila Stetts2-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesMarcela Urcia / Dana Doo-Soghoian vs Marisa Ptak / Carla Kuhl6-0, 6-0
2023-02-02vs WHITNEY MESA PARK #2Lost 12
W#1 DoublesPatricia Hawkins / Tori Rosenthal vs Patricia Delgado / Stefani Warren6-4, 6-4
L#2 DoublesTi Beasley / Jackie Seavey vs Dixie Stephens / Ginger Nakamura3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesDana Doo-Soghoian / Kay Higer vs Sara Schnabel / Annabel Elliott2-6, 1-6
2023-01-19vs NV/DAVIS/65&OVER/W7.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesPatricia Hawkins / Marcela Urcia vs Arlene Babbitt / Sandie Mainwal-Price3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJudith Kraus / Doreen Lono vs Cappi Bates / Cherry Marshall6-7, 3-6
L#3 DoublesCheryl Landholm / Tori Rosenthal vs Kathie Dye / Deborah Davis2-6, 1-6
2023-01-12vs WHITNEY MESA PARK #1Won 21
L#1 DoublesJackie Seavey / Tori Rosenthal vs Clairen Peeters / Lana Penrose5-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesMarcela Urcia / Patricia Hawkins vs Diane Schopp / Phyllis Baker6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesJudith Kraus / Doreen Lono vs N/A6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 WOMEN have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.01
Tori Rosenthal
usually #1 Doubles 71%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
3.00
Barbara Randell
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Doreen Lono
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
Jackie Seavey
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.69
Kay Higer
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.58
Cheryl Landholm
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
Dana Doo-Soghoian
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 0
Judith Kraus
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Marcela Urcia
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Patricia Hawkins
usually #1 Doubles 63%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Ti Beasley
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Cheryl Landholm + Barbara Randell3739% games−5.7% vs expected
Judith Kraus + Barbara Randell31037% games−8.6% vs expected
Tori Rosenthal + Patricia Hawkins142148% gamesnot enough data
Doreen Lono + Patricia Hawkins7846% gamesnot enough data
Jackie Seavey + Barbara Randell5644% gamesnot enough data
Marcela Urcia + Judith Kraus2539% gamesnot enough data
Tori Rosenthal + Kay Higer2441% gamesnot enough data
Doreen Lono + Cheryl Landholm1541% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Tori Rosenthal
48W–59L career · 7 lines in 2023
<1%47%53%
3.01
3
Barbara Randell
93W–106L career · type A · 2 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Doreen Lono
26W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Jackie Seavey
22W–31L career · 6 lines in 2023
not enough data
3
Kay Higer
73W–89L career · 7 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
2.69
3
Cheryl Landholm
41W–76L career · 4 lines in 2023
27%72%<1%
2.58
0
Dana Doo-Soghoian
18W–60L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Judith Kraus
58W–82L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marcela Urcia
55W–76L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Patricia Hawkins
34W–52L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
Ti Beasley
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.