Teams

OC - LLW - LPC - Annie Sat 9am

2021 SCTA Tri-Level 18 & Over - OC · OC Women - 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 Weekend

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
W#2 DoublesKarissa Do / Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits vs Cheryl Gates / Jill Muranaka6-1, 6-3
W#1 DoublesAnnie Ngo / Christina Catipay vs Kelly Casares / Lesley Hawks2-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLy Diem Nguyen Kursits / Jennifer Leong vs Laura Chasin / Karen Brink7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPat Papartassee / Lisa Nguyen vs Karin Ross / Jill Wigney6-1, 6-1
2021-10-23Won 20
W#1 DoublesChristina Catipay / Kristen Hoppe vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Hay / Kristina Ebon vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2021-10-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesChristina Catipay / Kristen Hoppe vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesKristina Ebon / Karissa Do vs Barbara Wilson / Karin Ross6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesPat Papartassee / Lisa Nguyen vs Jill Wigney / Annie Clark6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for OC Women - 3.5 - 4.0 - 4.5 Weekend have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.15 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Kristina Ebon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.44
Kristen Hoppe
published
4.23
Pat Papartassee
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.20
Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Christina Catipay
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.07
Michelle Hay
published
3.96
Karissa Do
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Julie Le
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christina Catipay + Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits5452% games−11.8% vs expected
Kristina Ebon + Karissa Do13366% gamesnot enough data
Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits + Pat Papartassee3544% gamesnot enough data
Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits + Karissa Do3255% gamesnot enough data
Christina Catipay + Karissa Do033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Kristina Ebon
133W–42L career · 2 lines in 2021
41%59%<1%
4.53
Kristen Hoppe
2W–4L career · no lines in 2021
67%33%<1%
4.44
4.5
Pat Papartassee
75W–78L career · 2 lines in 2021
4%94%2%
4.23
4.5
Ly Diem Nguyen Kursits
84W–76L career · 2 lines in 2021
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Christina Catipay
136W–105L career · 3 lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
4.07
Michelle Hay
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
29%71%<1%
4.07
4
Karissa Do
90W–75L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%63%37%
3.96
Julie Le
5W–13L career · no lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.70
Stella Nguyen Bezabeh
6W–7L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.