Teams

IE-MTC-Jeanne Shelter

2023 USTA Mixed Doubles 18 & Over - IE · IE Mixed 7.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-04-01vs IE-SVLCC-Stephen MejiaSplit 11
L#1 DoublesMike Deluca / Rebecca Cloyd vs Marilyn Pellouchoud / Ralph Pena6-0, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesDavid Duncan / Jamie Warrington vs Jimbo Evans / Kris McCabe6-2, 6-3
2023-03-25vs IE-APTC-Jo Russo-PereyraLost 01
L#3 DoublesMike Deluca / Rebecca Cloyd vs Haro Leonnard / Nova Gray4-6, 7-6, 1-0
2023-02-19vs IE-APTC-Jo Russo-PereyraWon 10
W#3 DoublesMark Bentley / Jamie Warrington vs Silvestre Aceves Reyes / Jo Russo-Pereyra6-2, 6-2
2023-02-05vs IE LLW- Canyon Crest CC- KayLost 01
L#1 DoublesMike Deluca / Rebecca Cloyd vs Scott Soren / Cristina Hamlin4-6, 6-7
2023-01-08vs IE-APTC-Jo Russo-PereyraLost 01
L#2 DoublesRebecca Cloyd / Mark Bentley vs Elizabeth Curtiss / Tony Archer5-7, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for IE Mixed 7.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.47 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Ryan Lieberman
published
3.74
Rebecca Cloyd
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Amanda Will
published 4
3.60
Judy Henning
published
3.58
Andrea Van Soest
published 4
3.48
Denise Radogna
published 3.5
3.34
Jamie Warrington
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.27
Elizabeth Bentley
published
3.27
David Duncan
published 3.5
3.22
Mary Ann Neder
published
3.19
Maureen Duncan
published
Doug van Soest
published
Mark Bentley
published
Mike Deluca
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Doug van Soest + Andrea Van Soest044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Ryan Lieberman
5W–1L career · no lines in 2023
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Rebecca Cloyd
92W–94L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.74
4
Amanda Will
0W–4L career · type A · no lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.63
Judy Henning
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
24%75%<1%
3.60
4
Andrea Van Soest
33W–38L career · type A · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Denise Radogna
10W–15L career · no lines in 2023
<1%56%44%
3.48
3.5
Jamie Warrington
169W–118L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%87%13%
3.34
Elizabeth Bentley
6W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
3.5
David Duncan
7W–10L career · no lines in 2023
3%92%5%
3.27
Mary Ann Neder
1W–4L career · no lines in 2023
98%2%<1%
3.22
Maureen Duncan
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
9%90%1%
3.19
Doug van Soest
2W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mark Bentley
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Mike Deluca
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.